diff options
author | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2021-01-14 16:56:08 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2021-01-15 11:00:03 +0300 |
commit | 163433e5c50afd8276f7dfdead4bf35f1bdafd05 (patch) | |
tree | af5c012dd732eeb619620bb4341e04eeaa62cca8 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | |
parent | d263dfa7d2697a43f3299b9731cd568ee49cdd2c (diff) | |
download | linux-163433e5c50afd8276f7dfdead4bf35f1bdafd05.tar.xz |
drm/i915: Mark up protected uses of 'i915_request_completed'
When we know that we are inside the timeline mutex, or inside the
submission flow (under active.lock or the holder's rcu lock), we know
that the rq->hwsp is stable and we can use the simpler direct version.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114135612.13210-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 0b1a46a0d866..784c05ac5cca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq) bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) { - if (!i915_request_completed(rq)) + if (!__i915_request_is_complete(rq)) return false; RQ_TRACE(rq, "\n"); @@ -342,8 +342,7 @@ void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq) struct i915_request *tmp; RQ_TRACE(rq, "\n"); - - GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(rq)); + GEM_BUG_ON(!__i915_request_is_complete(rq)); do { tmp = list_first_entry(&tl->requests, typeof(*tmp), link); @@ -552,7 +551,7 @@ bool __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request) * dropped upon retiring. (Otherwise if resubmit a *retired* * request, this would be a horrible use-after-free.) */ - if (i915_request_completed(request)) + if (__i915_request_is_complete(request)) goto xfer; if (unlikely(intel_context_is_banned(request->context))) @@ -652,7 +651,7 @@ void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request) i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(request); /* We've already spun, don't charge on resubmitting. */ - if (request->sched.semaphores && i915_request_started(request)) + if (request->sched.semaphores && __i915_request_has_started(request)) request->sched.semaphores = 0; /* @@ -864,7 +863,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp) RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->timeline, tl); RCU_INIT_POINTER(rq->hwsp_cacheline, tl->hwsp_cacheline); rq->hwsp_seqno = tl->hwsp_seqno; - GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_completed(rq)); + GEM_BUG_ON(__i915_request_is_complete(rq)); rq->rcustate = get_state_synchronize_rcu(); /* acts as smp_mb() */ @@ -978,7 +977,7 @@ i915_request_await_start(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_request *signal) struct i915_request *prev; /* Confirm signal has not been retired, the link is valid */ - if (unlikely(i915_request_started(signal))) + if (unlikely(__i915_request_has_started(signal))) break; /* Is signal the earliest request on its timeline? */ @@ -1520,7 +1519,7 @@ __i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq) */ prev = to_request(__i915_active_fence_set(&timeline->last_request, &rq->fence)); - if (prev && !i915_request_completed(prev)) { + if (prev && !__i915_request_is_complete(prev)) { /* * The requests are supposed to be kept in order. However, * we need to be wary in case the timeline->last_request @@ -1897,10 +1896,10 @@ static char queue_status(const struct i915_request *rq) static const char *run_status(const struct i915_request *rq) { - if (i915_request_completed(rq)) + if (__i915_request_is_complete(rq)) return "!"; - if (i915_request_started(rq)) + if (__i915_request_has_started(rq)) return "*"; if (!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->semaphore)) |