summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>2021-12-16 17:32:27 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2022-01-27 13:05:02 +0300
commit23606176a3b4fe2c63121d098da7fc7180dad4d1 (patch)
tree1066d1ebde34c7ee637fb19bbd9f45b31e670d0c /drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
parente8ffc355c7d67c63461859242a2aac3aa80ca00b (diff)
downloadlinux-23606176a3b4fe2c63121d098da7fc7180dad4d1.tar.xz
irqchip/gic-v4: Disable redistributors' view of the VPE table at boot time
[ Upstream commit 79a7f77b9b154d572bd9d2f1eecf58c4d018d8e2 ] Jay Chen reported that using a kdump kernel on a GICv4.1 system results in a RAS error being delivered when the secondary kernel configures the ITS's view of the new VPE table. As it turns out, that's because each RD still has a pointer to the previous instance of the VPE table, and that particular implementation is very upset by seeing two bits of the HW that should point to the same table with different values. To solve this, let's invalidate any reference that any RD has to the VPE table when discovering the RDs. The ITS can then be programmed as expected. Reported-by: Jay Chen <jkchen@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211214064716.21407-1-jkchen@linux.alibaba.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211216144804.1578566-1-maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index fd4e9a37fea6..7bbccb13b896 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -920,6 +920,22 @@ static int __gic_update_rdist_properties(struct redist_region *region,
{
u64 typer = gic_read_typer(ptr + GICR_TYPER);
+ /* Boot-time cleanip */
+ if ((typer & GICR_TYPER_VLPIS) && (typer & GICR_TYPER_RVPEID)) {
+ u64 val;
+
+ /* Deactivate any present vPE */
+ val = gicr_read_vpendbaser(ptr + SZ_128K + GICR_VPENDBASER);
+ if (val & GICR_VPENDBASER_Valid)
+ gicr_write_vpendbaser(GICR_VPENDBASER_PendingLast,
+ ptr + SZ_128K + GICR_VPENDBASER);
+
+ /* Mark the VPE table as invalid */
+ val = gicr_read_vpropbaser(ptr + SZ_128K + GICR_VPROPBASER);
+ val &= ~GICR_VPROPBASER_4_1_VALID;
+ gicr_write_vpropbaser(val, ptr + SZ_128K + GICR_VPROPBASER);
+ }
+
gic_data.rdists.has_vlpis &= !!(typer & GICR_TYPER_VLPIS);
/* RVPEID implies some form of DirectLPI, no matter what the doc says... :-/ */