diff options
| author | Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com> | 2019-11-20 12:45:26 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> | 2020-01-24 11:46:46 +0300 |
| commit | 2406a307ac7ddfd7effeeaff6947149ec6a95b4e (patch) | |
| tree | b587599d876d0aa332977e742dd778ae5c91a09e /fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | |
| parent | 5dcdc43e24a1810d3c3f4959af3d0c8e0026d863 (diff) | |
| download | linux-2406a307ac7ddfd7effeeaff6947149ec6a95b4e.tar.xz | |
ovl: implement async IO routines
A performance regression was observed since linux v4.19 with aio test using
fio with iodepth 128 on overlayfs. The queue depth of the device was
always 1 which is unexpected.
After investigation, it was found that commit 16914e6fc7e1 ("ovl: add
ovl_read_iter()") and commit 2a92e07edc5e ("ovl: add ovl_write_iter()")
resulted in vfs_iter_{read,write} being called on underlying filesystem,
which always results in syncronous IO.
Implement async IO for stacked reading and writing. This resolves the
performance regresion.
This is implemented by allocating a new kiocb for submitting the AIO
request on the underlying filesystem. When the request is completed, the
new kiocb is freed and the completion callback is called on the original
iocb.
Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h index dabfa0d559fb..3623d28aa4fa 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ struct dentry *ovl_create_temp(struct dentry *workdir, struct ovl_cattr *attr); /* file.c */ extern const struct file_operations ovl_file_operations; +int __init ovl_aio_request_cache_init(void); +void ovl_aio_request_cache_destroy(void); /* copy_up.c */ int ovl_copy_up(struct dentry *dentry); |