summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/slub.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>2021-05-18 03:01:39 +0300
committerVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>2021-09-04 02:12:20 +0300
commit9b4bc85a69f57fea93c1f359b393d2c24857d2f5 (patch)
tree1da6925aef4fcc0066ef3c60f5973201af20e3ad /mm/slub.c
parent1572df7cbcb48936c880f2d2de524f8e47ab65d4 (diff)
downloadlinux-9b4bc85a69f57fea93c1f359b393d2c24857d2f5.tar.xz
mm, slub: simplify kmem_cache_cpu and tid setup
In slab_alloc_node() and do_slab_free() fastpaths we need to guarantee that our kmem_cache_cpu pointer is from the same cpu as the tid value. Currently that's done by reading the tid first using this_cpu_read(), then the kmem_cache_cpu pointer and verifying we read the same tid using the pointer and plain READ_ONCE(). This can be simplified to just fetching kmem_cache_cpu pointer and then reading tid using the pointer. That guarantees they are from the same cpu. We don't need to read the tid using this_cpu_read() because the value will be validated by this_cpu_cmpxchg_double(), making sure we are on the correct cpu and the freelist didn't change by anyone preempting us since reading the tid. Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/slub.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/slub.c22
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 9607ce37e661..c0dc5968223c 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2882,15 +2882,14 @@ redo:
* reading from one cpu area. That does not matter as long
* as we end up on the original cpu again when doing the cmpxchg.
*
- * We should guarantee that tid and kmem_cache are retrieved on
- * the same cpu. It could be different if CONFIG_PREEMPTION so we need
- * to check if it is matched or not.
+ * We must guarantee that tid and kmem_cache_cpu are retrieved on the
+ * same cpu. We read first the kmem_cache_cpu pointer and use it to read
+ * the tid. If we are preempted and switched to another cpu between the
+ * two reads, it's OK as the two are still associated with the same cpu
+ * and cmpxchg later will validate the cpu.
*/
- do {
- tid = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->tid);
- c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
- } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION) &&
- unlikely(tid != READ_ONCE(c->tid)));
+ c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+ tid = READ_ONCE(c->tid);
/*
* Irqless object alloc/free algorithm used here depends on sequence
@@ -3164,11 +3163,8 @@ redo:
* data is retrieved via this pointer. If we are on the same cpu
* during the cmpxchg then the free will succeed.
*/
- do {
- tid = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->tid);
- c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
- } while (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPTION) &&
- unlikely(tid != READ_ONCE(c->tid)));
+ c = raw_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+ tid = READ_ONCE(c->tid);
/* Same with comment on barrier() in slab_alloc_node() */
barrier();