summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-09-04arm64: mte: Validate the PROT_MTE request via arch_validate_flags()Catalin Marinas1-1/+13
Make use of the newly introduced arch_validate_flags() hook to sanity-check the PROT_MTE request passed to mmap() and mprotect(). If the mapping does not support MTE, these syscalls will return -EINVAL. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-09-04arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect()Catalin Marinas1-3/+41
To enable tagging on a memory range, the user must explicitly opt in via a new PROT_MTE flag passed to mmap() or mprotect(). Since this is a new memory type in the AttrIndx field of a pte, simplify the or'ing of these bits over the protection_map[] attributes by making MT_NORMAL index 0. There are two conditions for arch_vm_get_page_prot() to return the MT_NORMAL_TAGGED memory type: (1) the user requested it via PROT_MTE, registered as VM_MTE in the vm_flags, and (2) the vma supports MTE, decided during the mmap() call (only) and registered as VM_MTE_ALLOWED. arch_calc_vm_prot_bits() is responsible for registering the user request as VM_MTE. The newly introduced arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() sets VM_MTE_ALLOWED if the mapping is MAP_ANONYMOUS. An MTE-capable filesystem (RAM-based) may be able to set VM_MTE_ALLOWED during its mmap() file ops call. In addition, update VM_DATA_DEFAULT_FLAGS to allow mprotect(PROT_MTE) on stack or brk area. The Linux mmap() syscall currently ignores unknown PROT_* flags. In the presence of MTE, an mmap(PROT_MTE) on a file which does not support MTE will not report an error and the memory will not be mapped as Normal Tagged. For consistency, mprotect(PROT_MTE) will not report an error either if the memory range does not support MTE. Two subsequent patches in the series will propose tightening of this behaviour. Co-developed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-03-16arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification supportDave Martin1-0/+37
This patch adds the bare minimum required to expose the ARMv8.5 Branch Target Identification feature to userspace. By itself, this does _not_ automatically enable BTI for any initial executable pages mapped by execve(). This will come later, but for now it should be possible to enable BTI manually on those pages by using mprotect() from within the target process. Other arches already using the generic mman.h are already using 0x10 for arch-specific prot flags, so we use that for PROT_BTI here. For consistency, signal handler entry points in BTI guarded pages are required to be annotated as such, just like any other function. This blocks a relatively minor attack vector, but comforming userspace will have the annotations anyway, so we may as well enforce them. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>