| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
As we do not have any internal priority levels, the priority can be set
directed from the user values.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120121439.17600-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Since we are not using any internal priority levels, and in the next few
patches will introduce a new index for which the optimisation is not so
lear cut, discard the small table within the priolist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120121439.17600-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.
v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.
Fixes: 2a98f4e65bba ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b72f02d78e4f257761ed003444ae52083f962076)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Now that we have fast timeslicing on semaphores, we no longer need to
prioritise none-semaphore work as we will yield any work blocked on a
semaphore to the next in the queue. Previously with no timeslicing,
blocking on the semaphore caused extremely bad scheduling with multiple
clients utilising multiple rings. Now, there is no impact and we can
remove the complication.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513173504.28322-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Upon waiting a request (when asked), we gave that request a small
priority boost, not enough for it to cause preemption, but enough for it
to be scheduled next before all equals. We also used that bit to give
new clients a small priority boost, similar to FQ_CODEL, such that we
favoured short interactive tasks ahead of long running streams.
However, this is causing lots of complications with timeslicing where we
both want to honour the boost and yet ignore it. Those complications
cause unexpected user behaviour (tasks not being timesliced and run
concurrently as epxected), and the easiest way to resolve that is to
remove the boost. Hopefully, we can find a compromise again if we need
to, but in theory timeslicing itself and future more advanced schedulers
should give us the interactivity boost we seek.
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/lateslice
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507152338.7452-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Replace sampling the engine state every so often with a periodic
heartbeat request to measure the health of an engine. This is coupled
with the forced-preemption to allow long running requests to survive so
long as they do not block other users.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
To flush idle barriers, and even inflight requests, we want to send a
preemptive 'pulse' along an engine. We use a no-op request along the
pinned kernel_context at high priority so that it should run or else
kick off the stuck requests. We can use this to ensure idle barriers are
immediately flushed, as part of a context cancellation mechanism, or as
part of a heartbeat mechanism to detect and reset a stuck GPU.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021174339.5389-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
If the backend wishes to defer the wakeref parking, make it responsible
for unlocking the wakeref (i.e. bumping the counter). This allows it to
time the unlock much more carefully in case it happens to needs the
wakeref to be active during its deferral.
For instance, during engine parking we may choose to emit an idle
barrier (a request). To do so, we borrow the engine->kernel_context
timeline and to ensure exclusive access we keep the
engine->wakeref.count as 0. However, to submit that request to HW may
require a intel_engine_pm_get() (e.g. to keep the submission tasklet
alive) and before we allow that we have to rewake our wakeref to avoid a
recursive deadlock.
<4> [257.742916] IRQs not enabled as expected
<4> [257.742930] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/softirq.c:169 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa9/0x100
<4> [257.742936] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic i915 btusb btrtl btbcm btintel snd_hda_intel snd_intel_nhlt bluetooth snd_hda_codec coretemp snd_hwdep crct10dif_pclmul snd_hda_core crc32_pclmul ecdh_generic ecc ghash_clmulni_intel snd_pcm r8169 realtek lpc_ich prime_numbers i2c_hid
<4> [257.742991] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G U W 5.3.0-rc3-g5d0a06cd532c-drmtip_340+ #1
<4> [257.742998] Hardware name: GIGABYTE GB-BXBT-1900/MZBAYAB-00, BIOS F6 02/17/2015
<4> [257.743008] RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0xa9/0x100
<4> [257.743017] Code: 37 5b 5d c3 8b 80 50 08 00 00 85 c0 75 a9 80 3d 0b be 25 01 00 75 a0 48 c7 c7 f3 0c 06 ac c6 05 fb bd 25 01 01 e8 77 84 ff ff <0f> 0b eb 89 48 89 ef e8 3b 41 06 00 eb 98 e8 e4 5c f4 ff 5b 5d c3
<4> [257.743025] RSP: 0018:ffffa78600003cb8 EFLAGS: 00010086
<4> [257.743035] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000200 RCX: 0000000000010302
<4> [257.743042] RDX: 0000000080010302 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
<4> [257.743050] RBP: ffffffffc0494bb3 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
<4> [257.743058] R10: 0000000014c8f0e9 R11: 00000000fee2ff8e R12: ffffa23ba8c38008
<4> [257.743065] R13: ffffa23bacc579c0 R14: ffffa23bb7db0f60 R15: ffffa23b9cc8c430
<4> [257.743074] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa23bbba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [257.743082] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [257.743089] CR2: 00007fe477b20778 CR3: 000000011f72a000 CR4: 00000000001006f0
<4> [257.743096] Call Trace:
<4> [257.743104] <IRQ>
<4> [257.743265] __i915_request_commit+0x240/0x5d0 [i915]
<4> [257.743427] ? __i915_request_create+0x228/0x4c0 [i915]
<4> [257.743584] __engine_park+0x64/0x250 [i915]
<4> [257.743730] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x1c/0x70 [i915]
<4> [257.743878] i915_sample+0x2ee/0x310 [i915]
<4> [257.744030] ? i915_pmu_cpu_offline+0xb0/0xb0 [i915]
<4> [257.744040] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x11e/0x4b0
<4> [257.744068] hrtimer_interrupt+0xea/0x250
<4> [257.744079] ? lockdep_hardirqs_off+0x79/0xd0
<4> [257.744101] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x96/0x280
<4> [257.744114] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
<4> [257.744125] RIP: 0010:__do_softirq+0xb3/0x4ae
v2: Keep the priority_hint assert
v3: That assert was desperately trying to point out my bug. Sorry, little
assert.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111378
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190813190705.23869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We want to set this flag in the next commit on requests containing
perf queries so that the result of the perf query can just be a delta
of global counters, rather than doing post processing of the OA
buffer.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[ickle: add basic selftest for nopreempt]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709164227.25859-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Commit 1413b2bc0717 ("drm/i915: Trim NEWCLIENT boosting") had the
intended consequence of not allowing a sequence of work that merely
crossed into a new engine the privilege to be promoted to NEWCLIENT
status. It also had the unintended consequence of actually making
NEWCLIENT effective on heavily oversubscribed transcode machines and
impacting upon their throughput.
If we consider a client packet composed of (rcsA, rcsB, vcs) and 30 of
those clients, using the NEWCLIENT boost that will be scheduled as
rcsA x 30, (rcsB, vcs) x 30
where as before it would have been
(rcsA, rcsB, vcs) x 30
That is with NEWCLIENT only boosting the first request of each client,
we would execute all rcsA requests prior to running on the vcs engines;
acruing a lot of dead time as compared to the previous case where the
vcs engine would be started in parallel to processing the second client.
The previous patch has the effect of delaying submission until it is
required by a third party (either the user with an explicit wait, or by
another client/engine). We reduce the NEWCLIENT bump to a mere WAIT,
which has the effect of removing its preemptive grant and reducing it to
the same level as any other user interaction -- that it will not be
promoted above the interengine dependencies, and so preventing NEWCLIENTS
from starving other engines. This a large nerf to the rrul properties of
the current NEWCLIENT, but it still does give prioritised submission to
new requests from light workloads.
References: b16c765122f9 ("drm/i915: Priority boost for new clients")
Fixes: 1413b2bc0717 ("drm/i915: Trim NEWCLIENT boosting") # customer impact
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Ermilov <dmitry.ermilov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190515130052.4475-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
For more intel_engine_mask_t detangling. This time so that we can use
intel_engine_mask_t inside the scheduling structs.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190401162641.10963-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
|
