summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-03-24drm/i915: give stolen system memory its own classMatthew Auld1-3/+3
In some future patches we will need to also support a stolen region carved from device local memory, on platforms like DG1. To handle this we can simply describe each in terms of its own memory class. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205102026.806699-2-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: cleanup the region class/instance encodingMatthew Auld1-12/+21
Get rid of the strange REGION_MAP encoding stuff and just use an explicit class/instance pair for each region. This better matches our future uAPI where all queryable regions are identified with a u16 class and u16 instance. v2: fix whitespace Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205102026.806699-1-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: introduce mem->reservedAbdiel Janulgue1-0/+14
In the following patch we need to reserve regions unaccessible to the driver during initialization, so add mem->reserved for collecting such regions. v2: turn into an actual intel_memory_region_reserve api Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-4-matthew.auld@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-03-24drm/i915: make local-memory probing a GT operationMatthew Auld1-3/+2
Device local memory is very much a GT thing, therefore it should be the responsibility of the GT to setup the device local memory region. Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210127131417.393872-1-matthew.auld@intel.com [danvet: Rebase conflict.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2021-01-13drm/i915/region: make intel_region_map staticJani Nikula1-1/+1
There are no users outside of intel_memory_region.c. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210112170429.27619-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-12-02Revert "drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G"Chris Wilson1-17/+1
Mixing I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS and I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE fared badly. The two directives conflict, with the contiguous request setting the min_order to the full size of the object, and the max-segment-size setting the max_order to the limit of the DMA mapper. This results in a situation where max_order < min_order, causing our sanity checks to fail. Instead of limiting the buddy block size, in the previous patch we split the oversized buddy into multiple scatterlist elements. Fixes: d2cf0125d4a1 ("drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-11-30drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4GVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota1-1/+17
Block sizes are only limited by the largest power-of-two that will fit in the region size, but to construct an object we also require feeding it into an sg list, where the upper limit of the sg entry is at most UINT_MAX. Therefore to prevent issues with allocating blocks that are too large, add the flag I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE which should limit block sizes to the i915_sg_segment_size(). v2: (matt) - query the max segment. - prefer flag to limit block size to 4G, since it's best not to assume the user will feed the blocks into an sg list. - simple selftest so we don't have to guess. Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130134721.54457-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2020-11-09drm/i915/region: fix order when adding blocksMatthew Auld1-1/+1
When performing an allocation we try split it down into the largest possible power-of-two blocks/pages-sizes, and for the common case we expect to allocate the blocks in descending order. This also naturally fits with our GTT alignment tricks(including the hugepages selftest), where we sometimes try to align to the largest possible GTT page-size for the allocation, in the hope that translates to bigger GTT page-sizes. Currently, we seem to incorrectly add the blocks in the opposite order, which is definitely not the intended behaviour. Reported-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109111249.109365-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2020-10-21drm/i915/region: fix max size calculationMatthew Auld1-1/+1
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check. v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris) Fixes: b908be543e44 ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2020-01-17drm/i915: convert to new logging macros in i915/intel_memory_region.cWambui Karuga1-1/+3
Replace the use of printk based logging macros with the new struct drm_device based logging macro in i915/intel_memory_region.c. Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1bf4d362e72c619843d44aac96c3561f54e4b23a.1578560355.git.wambui.karugax@gmail.com
2020-01-05drm/i915: lookup for mem_region of a mem_typeRamalingam C1-0/+14
Lookup function to retrieve the pointer to a memory region of a mem_type. v2: for_each_memory_region is used. Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200104191043.2207314-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-28drm/i915/lmem: debugfs for LMEM detailsLukasz Fiedorowicz1-1/+14
Debugfs i915_gem_object is extended to enable the IGTs to detect the LMEM's availability and the total size of LMEM. v2: READ_ONCE is used [Chris] v3: %pa is used for printing the resource [Chris] v4: All regions' details added to debugfs [Chris] v5: Macro for_each_mem_region added name is initialized at region init [Chris] Signed-off-by: Lukasz Fiedorowicz <lukasz.fiedorowicz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191227133748.4330-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
2019-12-17drm/i915/gem: Apply lmem size restriction to get_pagesChris Wilson1-0/+3
When creating a handle, it is just that, an abstract handle. The fact that we cannot currently support a handle larger than the size of the backing storage is an artifact of our whole-object-at-a-time handling in get_pages() and being an implementation limitation is best handled at that point -- similar to shmem, where we only barf when asked to populate the whole object if larger than RAM. (Pinning the whole object at a time is major hindrance that we are likely to have to overcome in the near future.) In the case of the buddy allocator, the late check is preferable as the request size may often be smaller than the required size. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216122603.2598155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-31drm/i915/lmem: add the fake lmem regionMatthew Auld1-0/+3
Intended for upstream testing so that we can still exercise the LMEM plumbing and !i915_ggtt_has_aperture paths. Smoke tested on Skull Canyon device. This works by allocating an intel_memory_region for a reserved portion of system memory, which we treat like LMEM. For the LMEMBAR we steal the aperture and 1:1 it map to the stolen region. To enable simply set the i915 modparam fake_lmem_start= on the kernel cmdline with the start of reserved region(see memmap=). The size of the region we can use is determined by the size of the mappable aperture, so the size of reserved region should be >= mappable_end. For now we only enable for the selftests. Depends on CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE being enabled. eg. memmap=2G$16G i915.fake_lmem_start=0x400000000 v2: make fake_lmem_start an i915 modparam Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030173320.8850-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-27drm/i915: Split memory_region initialisation into its own fileChris Wilson1-0/+56
Pull the memory region bookkeeping into its file. Let's start clean and see how long it lasts! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191026202032.4371-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-18drm/i915: treat shmem as a regionMatthew Auld1-0/+10
Convert shmem to an intel_memory_region. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018090751.28295-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-08drm/i915/region: support volatile objectsMatthew Auld1-0/+5
Volatile objects are marked as DONTNEED while pinned, therefore once unpinned the backing store can be discarded. This is limited to kernel internal objects. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-08drm/i915/region: support contiguous allocationsMatthew Auld1-1/+8
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel API...so perhaps something to be improved. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-08drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_regionMatthew Auld1-0/+191
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen, shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com