From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c') diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c index 6555821bbdae..c0b5df3167a0 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-pit.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline void pit_write(void __iomem *base, unsigned int reg_offset, unsign * Clocksource: just a monotonic counter of MCK/16 cycles. * We don't care whether or not PIT irqs are enabled. */ -static cycle_t read_pit_clk(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 read_pit_clk(struct clocksource *cs) { struct pit_data *data = clksrc_to_pit_data(cs); unsigned long flags; -- cgit v1.2.3