From d4019f0a92ab802f385cc9c8ad3ab7b5449712cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:38:24 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq core Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson Acked-by: Linus Walleij Acked-by: Russell King Acked-by: Stephen Warren Tested-by: Andrew Lunn Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c | 38 +++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c index b5512712298f..be6d14307aa8 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c @@ -53,15 +53,14 @@ static unsigned int omap_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - int r, ret = 0; - struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; struct dev_pm_opp *opp; unsigned long freq, volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0; + unsigned int old_freq, new_freq; - freqs.old = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu); - freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; + old_freq = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu); + new_freq = freq_table[index].frequency; - freq = freqs.new * 1000; + freq = new_freq * 1000; ret = clk_round_rate(mpu_clk, freq); if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret)) { dev_warn(mpu_dev, @@ -77,7 +76,7 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) if (IS_ERR(opp)) { rcu_read_unlock(); dev_err(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to find MPU OPP for %d\n", - __func__, freqs.new); + __func__, new_freq); return -EINVAL; } volt = dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(opp); @@ -87,43 +86,32 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) } dev_dbg(mpu_dev, "cpufreq-omap: %u MHz, %ld mV --> %u MHz, %ld mV\n", - freqs.old / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1, - freqs.new / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1); - - /* notifiers */ - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); + old_freq / 1000, volt_old ? volt_old / 1000 : -1, + new_freq / 1000, volt ? volt / 1000 : -1); /* scaling up? scale voltage before frequency */ - if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new > freqs.old)) { + if (mpu_reg && (new_freq > old_freq)) { r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol); if (r < 0) { dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage up.\n", __func__); - freqs.new = freqs.old; - goto done; + return r; } } - ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.new * 1000); + ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, new_freq * 1000); /* scaling down? scale voltage after frequency */ - if (mpu_reg && (freqs.new < freqs.old)) { + if (mpu_reg && (new_freq < old_freq)) { r = regulator_set_voltage(mpu_reg, volt - tol, volt + tol); if (r < 0) { dev_warn(mpu_dev, "%s: unable to scale voltage down.\n", __func__); - ret = clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, freqs.old * 1000); - freqs.new = freqs.old; - goto done; + clk_set_rate(mpu_clk, old_freq * 1000); + return r; } } - freqs.new = omap_getspeed(policy->cpu); - -done: - /* notifiers */ - cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); - return ret; } -- cgit v1.2.3