From 49598e04b5a1c3679cbee0dda8c2a0461e9bb320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jun Piao Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:17:49 -0500 Subject: ext4: use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' We could use 'sbi' instead of 'EXT4_SB(sb)' to make code more elegant. Signed-off-by: Jun Piao Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ext4/mballoc.c') diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 1a7ea5f9276f..769a62708b1c 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -757,10 +757,10 @@ void ext4_mb_generate_buddy(struct super_block *sb, clear_bit(EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT, &(grp->bb_state)); period = get_cycles() - period; - spin_lock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_bal_lock); - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_buddies_generated++; - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_generation_time += period; - spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_bal_lock); + spin_lock(&sbi->s_bal_lock); + sbi->s_mb_buddies_generated++; + sbi->s_mb_generation_time += period; + spin_unlock(&sbi->s_bal_lock); } static void mb_regenerate_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b) @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void mb_free_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b, ext4_fsblk_t blocknr; blocknr = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, e4b->bd_group); - blocknr += EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), block); + blocknr += EXT4_C2B(sbi, block); ext4_grp_locked_error(sb, e4b->bd_group, inode ? inode->i_ino : 0, blocknr, @@ -4838,9 +4838,9 @@ do_more: if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) || in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), block, count) || in_range(block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp), - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) || + sbi->s_itb_per_group) || in_range(block + count - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp), - EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group)) { + sbi->s_itb_per_group)) { ext4_error(sb, "Freeing blocks in system zone - " "Block = %llu, count = %lu", block, count); -- cgit v1.2.3