diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch | 19 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch b/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch index c15b6e7d8..5f2178734 100644 --- a/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch +++ b/poky/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0012-don-t-pass-AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW-flag-to-faccessat.patch @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -From 03e89da266edf70121a19ffc32a78cc3b97585ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From 06915b70735caa66987af758ebdc4207757ae758 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:33:30 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH 12/26] don't pass AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag to faccessat() +Subject: [PATCH] don't pass AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag to faccessat() Avoid using AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag. It doesn't seem like the right thing to do and it's not portable (not supported by musl). See: @@ -25,20 +25,22 @@ just historical and not actually necessary or desired behaviour? Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [musl specific] Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com> + --- - src/basic/fs-util.h | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- + src/basic/fs-util.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- src/shared/base-filesystem.c | 6 +++--- - 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) + 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/basic/fs-util.h b/src/basic/fs-util.h -index 5dc8853eac..0491b3dae2 100644 +index 027037f7a7..16eb379caf 100644 --- a/src/basic/fs-util.h +++ b/src/basic/fs-util.h -@@ -43,7 +43,27 @@ int futimens_opath(int fd, const struct timespec ts[2]); +@@ -44,8 +44,27 @@ int futimens_opath(int fd, const struct timespec ts[2]); int fd_warn_permissions(const char *path, int fd); int stat_warn_permissions(const char *path, const struct stat *st); --#define laccess(path, mode) faccessat(AT_FDCWD, (path), (mode), AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) +-#define laccess(path, mode) \ +- (faccessat(AT_FDCWD, (path), (mode), AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) < 0 ? -errno : 0) +/* + Avoid using AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag. It doesn't seem like the right thing to + do and it's not portable (not supported by musl). See: @@ -94,6 +96,3 @@ index 1d05409086..1ed06c31ab 100644 continue; } --- -2.27.0 - |