From 0373da3f0baf0f5d90e978b9f735306d06e19d24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Glass Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:43:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] image: Be a little more verbose when checking signatures It is useful to be a little more specific about what is being checked. Update a few messages to help with this. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo --- common/image-fit.c | 2 +- tools/image-host.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c index f31e93a364..8a7c78f4c1 100644 --- a/common/image-fit.c +++ b/common/image-fit.c @@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ int fit_image_load(bootm_headers_t *images, ulong addr, fit_uname = fit_get_name(fit, noffset, NULL); } if (noffset < 0) { - puts("Could not find subimage node\n"); + printf("Could not find subimage node type '%s'\n", prop_name); bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_SUBNODE); return -ENOENT; } diff --git a/tools/image-host.c b/tools/image-host.c index 7effb6cea5..01fdec276d 100644 --- a/tools/image-host.c +++ b/tools/image-host.c @@ -717,7 +717,8 @@ int fit_check_sign(const void *fit, const void *key) if (!cfg_noffset) return -1; - printf("Verifying Hash Integrity ... "); + printf("Verifying Hash Integrity for node '%s'... ", + fdt_get_name(fit, cfg_noffset, NULL)); ret = fit_config_verify(fit, cfg_noffset); if (ret) return ret;