| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The less we rely on boost, and more on std algorithms, the less people
have to look up, and the more likely that our code will deduplicate.
Replace all uses of boost::algorithms with std alternatives.
Tested: Redfish Service Validator passes.
Change-Id: I8a26f39b5709adc444b4178e92f5f3c7b988b05b
Signed-off-by: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com>
|
|
There are certain cases where we use this split function, and we expect
tokens to be read out. For example:
/xyz/openbmc_project/sensors/unit/name
Should split into a "" in the first position. This use case is not
common, and a quick grep shows only two places in the code expect this
behavior. Boost::split has this behavior already, which is what this
function is emulating. While we could fix these, in the end they should
be following the rules outlined in COMMON_ERRORS.md, which disallow
this kind of parsing completely.
Tested: New unit tests passing.
Signed-off-by: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com>
Change-Id: Iec3dcbf2b495b2b3b4ed419172c4133b16f7c65d
|
|
boost::split has a documented false-positive in clang-tidy. While
normally we'd handle this with NOLINTNEXTLINE, this doesn't appear to
work in all cases. Unclear why, but seems to be due to some of our
lambda callback complexity.
Each of these uses is a case where we should be using a more specific
check, rather than split, but for the moment, this is the best we have.
Tested: clang-tidy passes.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/40486
Signed-off-by: Ed Tanous <edtanous@google.com>
Change-Id: I144c6610cb740287b7225e2be03b4142a64f9563
|
