diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'meta-arm/meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0024-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | meta-arm/meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0024-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch | 34 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/meta-arm/meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0024-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch b/meta-arm/meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0024-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch deleted file mode 100644 index c6a1aed2e6..0000000000 --- a/meta-arm/meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0024-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -From c0c6e4c1166c4868afc36649b9ed98081a6966e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Gowtham Suresh Kumar <gowtham.sureshkumar@arm.com> -Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:22:52 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH 24/27] Comment mm_communicate failure log - -When a getVariable() call is made with data size set to 0, -mm_communicate should return EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL. This is -an expected behavior. There should not be any failure logs -in this case. So the error log is commented here. - -Signed-off-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@linaro.org> ---- - lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c | 5 ++++- - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c -index 67743d1f8fce..a34989efac83 100644 ---- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c -+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_variable_tee.c -@@ -411,7 +411,10 @@ static efi_status_t __efi_runtime mm_communicate(u8 *comm_buf, efi_uintn_t dsize - ret = ffa_mm_communicate(comm_buf, dsize); - #endif - if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS) { -- log_err("%s failed!\n", __func__); -+ /* mm_communicate failure is logged even when getVariable() is called -+ * with data size set to 0. This is not expected so logging is commented. -+ */ -+ //log_err("%s failed!\n", __func__); - return ret; - } - --- -2.30.2 - |