summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch')
-rw-r--r--meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1c267c313b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/openjpeg/openjpeg/CVE-2020-27814-4.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+From 4ce7d285a55d29b79880d0566d4b010fe1907aa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: yuan <zodf0055980@gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:00:22 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] Encoder: grow again buffer size in
+ opj_tcd_code_block_enc_allocate_data() (fixes #1283)
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/openjpeg2/2.3.1-1ubuntu4.20.04.1/openjpeg2_2.3.1-1ubuntu4.20.04.1.debian.tar.xz]
+CVE: CVE-2020-27814
+Signed-off-by: Virendra Thakur <virendra.thakur@kpit.com>
+---
+ src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c | 3 ++-
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c
++++ b/src/lib/openjp2/tcd.c
+@@ -1240,9 +1240,10 @@ static OPJ_BOOL opj_tcd_code_block_enc_a
+ /* and +28 for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1283 (-M 44) */
+ /* and +33 for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1283 (-M 4) */
+ /* and +63 for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1283 (-M 4 -IMF 2K) */
++ /* and +74 for https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1283 (-M 4 -n 8 -s 7,7 -I) */
+ /* TODO: is there a theoretical upper-bound for the compressed code */
+ /* block size ? */
+- l_data_size = 63 + (OPJ_UINT32)((p_code_block->x1 - p_code_block->x0) *
++ l_data_size = 74 + (OPJ_UINT32)((p_code_block->x1 - p_code_block->x0) *
+ (p_code_block->y1 - p_code_block->y0) * (OPJ_INT32)sizeof(OPJ_UINT32));
+
+ if (l_data_size > p_code_block->data_size) {