| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Upstream yocto introduced a change via e510222 (systemd-systemctl:
fix instance template WantedBy symlink construction).
This fixes a bug that we in OpenBMC had been taking advantage of in that
we were able to document our templated target dependencies without it
actually doing anything. The real installation of services within
targets occurs in our bitbake recipes due to the complexity of chassis
and host instances on a per machine basis.
Leave the dependency information in the service files but comment them
out. It's useful to be able to look at a service and understand which
targets it's going to be installed into by the bitbake recipes.
The service files are already properly installed into the appropriate
targets by the recipe.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com>
Change-Id: Idcb5458b6f2a3007c20f546604d4095650148803
|
|
As noted in the following mailing list thread:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/2022-November/032457.html
and implemented via this series of commits:
https://gerrit.openbmc.org/q/topic:op-power-control-ref
Some systemd services had their names changed. Update this service file
to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com>
Change-Id: Ic0f35cbc3eb8e0914986013d35bef3d256093a9c
|
|
This power control implementation is not specific to openpower systems
(as seen by the variety of systems including it) so rename it to
something more appropriate.
This is using code from skeleton which is not ideal but that's a change
for another day.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Geissler <geissonator@yahoo.com>
Change-Id: Iffe6427b5494558b53cd6f5716a08cce82cb90d8
|
