diff options
| author | Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> | 2024-05-29 10:39:10 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-06-21 15:40:29 +0300 |
| commit | 22f742b8f738918f683198a18ec3c691acda14c4 (patch) | |
| tree | 54d609349ce1f09b2eaade39304fd6cf89f7ac15 | |
| parent | 10fc691c69fca4c558ff79b3f5014f5f26955767 (diff) | |
| download | linux-22f742b8f738918f683198a18ec3c691acda14c4.tar.xz | |
memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES
commit e0eec24e2e199873f43df99ec39773ad3af2bff7 upstream.
On an (old) x86 system with SRAT just covering space above 4Gb:
ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff] hotplug
the commit referenced below leads to this NUMA configuration no longer
being refused by a CONFIG_NUMA=y kernel (previously
NUMA: nodes only cover 6144MB of your 8185MB e820 RAM. Not used.
No NUMA configuration found
Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000027fffffff]
was seen in the log directly after the message quoted above), because of
memblock_validate_numa_coverage() checking for NUMA_NO_NODE (only). This
in turn led to memblock_alloc_range_nid()'s warning about MAX_NUMNODES
triggering, followed by a NULL deref in memmap_init() when trying to
access node 64's (NODE_SHIFT=6) node data.
To compensate said change, make memblock_set_node() warn on and adjust
a passed in value of MAX_NUMNODES, just like various other functions
already do.
Fixes: ff6c3d81f2e8 ("NUMA: optimize detection of memory with no node id assigned by firmware")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1c8a058c-5365-4f27-a9f1-3aeb7fb3e7b2@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memblock.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index d09136e040d3..08e9806b1cf9 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -1339,6 +1339,10 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, int start_rgn, end_rgn; int i, ret; + if (WARN_ONCE(nid == MAX_NUMNODES, + "Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is deprecated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n")) + nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; + ret = memblock_isolate_range(type, base, size, &start_rgn, &end_rgn); if (ret) return ret; |