diff options
author | Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> | 2020-08-12 04:31:34 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-09-17 14:55:41 +0300 |
commit | 96ccd5a5bc0668730c34803145442c9daf45d014 (patch) | |
tree | 3e4d9f05f002823fb3d99ec376a7df9e4e2f91cf | |
parent | 47052502f04084426b3465ea1f874c8a9cc9861e (diff) | |
download | linux-96ccd5a5bc0668730c34803145442c9daf45d014.tar.xz |
regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock
commit 73a32129f8ccb556704a26b422f54e048bf14bd0 upstream.
Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy
when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using
a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the
allocation.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.7.13+ #533 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock:
cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154
but task is already holding lock:
c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50
fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28
__kmalloc+0x54/0x218
regulator_register+0x860/0x1584
dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kswapd0/383:
#0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50
[...]
Fixes: d8ca7d184b33 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/regulator/core.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 0ba5ca7082af..02ccd3726f69 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -4978,7 +4978,10 @@ static int regulator_init_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (!of_check_coupling_data(rdev)) return -EPERM; + mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex); rdev->coupling_desc.coupler = regulator_find_coupler(rdev); + mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); + if (IS_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler)) { err = PTR_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler); rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get coupler: %d\n", err); @@ -5184,9 +5187,7 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc, if (ret < 0) goto wash; - mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex); ret = regulator_init_coupling(rdev); - mutex_unlock(®ulator_list_mutex); if (ret < 0) goto wash; |