summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-05-13 21:32:10 +0400
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-06-11 00:42:38 +0400
commitce5f4fc861e84739289c187f147040e6af6599b2 (patch)
treeac365ac7c98ed8dcd67c445c6efff96057fd271b
parent295fde89be1b7dce874c0f38d8bb78975a25d46e (diff)
downloadlinux-ce5f4fc861e84739289c187f147040e6af6599b2.tar.xz
nohz_full: Document additional restrictions
This commit calls out the potential for slowing the tick even when there are multiple runnable processes per CPU, It also points out that current mainlined version keeps the tick going on at least one CPU even when all CPUs are otherwise idle. Finally, it notes the need for a 1-HZ tick in order to calculate CPU load, maintain sched average, compute CFS entity vruntime, compute avenrun, and carry out load balancing. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-rw-r--r--Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt21
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt b/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
index d5323e075550..88697584242b 100644
--- a/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/timers/NO_HZ.txt
@@ -278,6 +278,11 @@ o Adaptive-ticks does not do anything unless there is only one
single runnable SCHED_FIFO task and multiple runnable SCHED_OTHER
tasks, even though these interrupts are unnecessary.
+ And even when there are multiple runnable tasks on a given CPU,
+ there is little point in interrupting that CPU until the current
+ running task's timeslice expires, which is almost always way
+ longer than the time of the next scheduling-clock interrupt.
+
Better handling of these sorts of situations is future work.
o A reboot is required to reconfigure both adaptive idle and RCU
@@ -308,6 +313,16 @@ o Unless all CPUs are idle, at least one CPU must keep the
scheduling-clock interrupt going in order to support accurate
timekeeping.
-o If there are adaptive-ticks CPUs, there will be at least one
- CPU keeping the scheduling-clock interrupt going, even if all
- CPUs are otherwise idle.
+o If there might potentially be some adaptive-ticks CPUs, there
+ will be at least one CPU keeping the scheduling-clock interrupt
+ going, even if all CPUs are otherwise idle.
+
+ Better handling of this situation is ongoing work.
+
+o Some process-handling operations still require the occasional
+ scheduling-clock tick. These operations include calculating CPU
+ load, maintaining sched average, computing CFS entity vruntime,
+ computing avenrun, and carrying out load balancing. They are
+ currently accommodated by scheduling-clock tick every second
+ or so. On-going work will eliminate the need even for these
+ infrequent scheduling-clock ticks.