diff options
author | Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> | 2021-04-29 13:30:48 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> | 2021-05-04 12:48:59 +0300 |
commit | 2bc9c04ea7020df3a98682f12c50e38870d3104a (patch) | |
tree | d025c39c54696041b79856926ef230feeffbc0cd /Documentation/gpu/rfc | |
parent | 0333ec8806dfe7b8766ad025821bf58dc49dc970 (diff) | |
download | linux-2bc9c04ea7020df3a98682f12c50e38870d3104a.tar.xz |
drm/doc/rfc: i915 DG1 uAPI
Add an entry for the new uAPI needed for DG1. Also add the overall
upstream plan, including some notes for the TTM conversion.
v2(Daniel):
- include the overall upstreaming plan
- add a note for mmap, there are differences here for TTM vs i915
- bunch of other suggestions from Daniel
v3:
(Daniel)
- add a note for set/get caching stuff
- add some more docs for existing query and extensions stuff
- add an actual code example for regions query
- bunch of other stuff
(Jason)
- uAPI change(!):
- try a simpler design with the placements extension
- rather than have a generic setparam which can cover multiple
use cases, have each extension be responsible for one thing
only
v4:
(Daniel)
- add some more notes for ttm conversion
- bunch of other stuff
(Jason)
- uAPI change(!):
- drop all the extra rsvd members for the region_query and
region_info, just keep the bare minimum needed for padding
v5:
(Jason)
- for the upstream plan, add a requirement that we send the uAPI bits
again for final sign off before turning it on for real
- document how we intend to extend the rsvd bits for the region query
(Kenneth)
- improve the comment for the smem+lmem mmap mode and caching
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Acked-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/gpu/rfc')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h | 237 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.rst | 131 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst | 4 |
3 files changed, 372 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d9c61bea0556 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@ +/** + * enum drm_i915_gem_memory_class - Supported memory classes + */ +enum drm_i915_gem_memory_class { + /** @I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM: System memory */ + I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM = 0, + /** @I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE: Device local-memory */ + I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, +}; + +/** + * struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance - Identify particular memory region + */ +struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance { + /** @memory_class: See enum drm_i915_gem_memory_class */ + __u16 memory_class; + + /** @memory_instance: Which instance */ + __u16 memory_instance; +}; + +/** + * struct drm_i915_memory_region_info - Describes one region as known to the + * driver. + * + * Note that we reserve some stuff here for potential future work. As an example + * we might want expose the capabilities for a given region, which could include + * things like if the region is CPU mappable/accessible, what are the supported + * mapping types etc. + * + * Note that to extend struct drm_i915_memory_region_info and struct + * drm_i915_query_memory_regions in the future the plan is to do the following: + * + * .. code-block:: C + * + * struct drm_i915_memory_region_info { + * struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region; + * union { + * __u32 rsvd0; + * __u32 new_thing1; + * }; + * ... + * union { + * __u64 rsvd1[8]; + * struct { + * __u64 new_thing2; + * __u64 new_thing3; + * ... + * }; + * }; + * }; + * + * With this things should remain source compatible between versions for + * userspace, even as we add new fields. + * + * Note this is using both struct drm_i915_query_item and struct drm_i915_query. + * For this new query we are adding the new query id DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS + * at &drm_i915_query_item.query_id. + */ +struct drm_i915_memory_region_info { + /** @region: The class:instance pair encoding */ + struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region; + + /** @rsvd0: MBZ */ + __u32 rsvd0; + + /** @probed_size: Memory probed by the driver (-1 = unknown) */ + __u64 probed_size; + + /** @unallocated_size: Estimate of memory remaining (-1 = unknown) */ + __u64 unallocated_size; + + /** @rsvd1: MBZ */ + __u64 rsvd1[8]; +}; + +/** + * struct drm_i915_query_memory_regions + * + * The region info query enumerates all regions known to the driver by filling + * in an array of struct drm_i915_memory_region_info structures. + * + * Example for getting the list of supported regions: + * + * .. code-block:: C + * + * struct drm_i915_query_memory_regions *info; + * struct drm_i915_query_item item = { + * .query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS; + * }; + * struct drm_i915_query query = { + * .num_items = 1, + * .items_ptr = (uintptr_t)&item, + * }; + * int err, i; + * + * // First query the size of the blob we need, this needs to be large + * // enough to hold our array of regions. The kernel will fill out the + * // item.length for us, which is the number of bytes we need. + * err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, &query); + * if (err) ... + * + * info = calloc(1, item.length); + * // Now that we allocated the required number of bytes, we call the ioctl + * // again, this time with the data_ptr pointing to our newly allocated + * // blob, which the kernel can then populate with the all the region info. + * item.data_ptr = (uintptr_t)&info, + * + * err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, &query); + * if (err) ... + * + * // We can now access each region in the array + * for (i = 0; i < info->num_regions; i++) { + * struct drm_i915_memory_region_info mr = info->regions[i]; + * u16 class = mr.region.class; + * u16 instance = mr.region.instance; + * + * .... + * } + * + * free(info); + */ +struct drm_i915_query_memory_regions { + /** @num_regions: Number of supported regions */ + __u32 num_regions; + + /** @rsvd: MBZ */ + __u32 rsvd[3]; + + /** @regions: Info about each supported region */ + struct drm_i915_memory_region_info regions[]; +}; + +#define DRM_I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT 0xdeadbeaf +#define DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT, struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext) + +/** + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext - Existing gem_create behaviour, with added + * extension support using struct i915_user_extension. + * + * Note that in the future we want to have our buffer flags here, at least for + * the stuff that is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to + * create the object with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters, + * however this creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered + * immutable. Also in general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls. + */ +struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext { + /** + * @size: Requested size for the object. + * + * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be returned. + * + * Note that for some devices we have might have further minimum + * page-size restrictions(larger than 4K), like for device local-memory. + * However in general the final size here should always reflect any + * rounding up, if for example using the I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS + * extension to place the object in device local-memory. + */ + __u64 size; + /** + * @handle: Returned handle for the object. + * + * Object handles are nonzero. + */ + __u32 handle; + /** @flags: MBZ */ + __u32 flags; + /** + * @extensions: The chain of extensions to apply to this object. + * + * This will be useful in the future when we need to support several + * different extensions, and we need to apply more than one when + * creating the object. See struct i915_user_extension. + * + * If we don't supply any extensions then we get the same old gem_create + * behaviour. + * + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS usage see + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions. + */ +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS 0 + __u64 extensions; +}; + +/** + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions - The + * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS extension. + * + * Set the object with the desired set of placements/regions in priority + * order. Each entry must be unique and supported by the device. + * + * This is provided as an array of struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance, or + * an equivalent layout of class:instance pair encodings. See struct + * drm_i915_query_memory_regions and DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS for how to + * query the supported regions for a device. + * + * As an example, on discrete devices, if we wish to set the placement as + * device local-memory we can do something like: + * + * .. code-block:: C + * + * struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region_lmem = { + * .memory_class = I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, + * .memory_instance = 0, + * }; + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions regions = { + * .base = { .name = I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS }, + * .regions = (uintptr_t)®ion_lmem, + * .num_regions = 1, + * }; + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext create_ext = { + * .size = 16 * PAGE_SIZE, + * .extensions = (uintptr_t)®ions, + * }; + * + * int err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT, &create_ext); + * if (err) ... + * + * At which point we get the object handle in &drm_i915_gem_create_ext.handle, + * along with the final object size in &drm_i915_gem_create_ext.size, which + * should account for any rounding up, if required. + */ +struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions { + /** @base: Extension link. See struct i915_user_extension. */ + struct i915_user_extension base; + + /** @pad: MBZ */ + __u32 pad; + /** @num_regions: Number of elements in the @regions array. */ + __u32 num_regions; + /** + * @regions: The regions/placements array. + * + * An array of struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance. + */ + __u64 regions; +}; diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1d344c593018 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.rst @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +========================= +I915 DG1/LMEM RFC Section +========================= + +Upstream plan +============= +For upstream the overall plan for landing all the DG1 stuff and turning it for +real, with all the uAPI bits is: + +* Merge basic HW enabling of DG1(still without pciid) +* Merge the uAPI bits behind special CONFIG_BROKEN(or so) flag + * At this point we can still make changes, but importantly this lets us + start running IGTs which can utilize local-memory in CI +* Convert over to TTM, make sure it all keeps working. Some of the work items: + * TTM shrinker for discrete + * dma_resv_lockitem for full dma_resv_lock, i.e not just trylock + * Use TTM CPU pagefault handler + * Route shmem backend over to TTM SYSTEM for discrete + * TTM purgeable object support + * Move i915 buddy allocator over to TTM + * MMAP ioctl mode(see `I915 MMAP`_) + * SET/GET ioctl caching(see `I915 SET/GET CACHING`_) +* Send RFC(with mesa-dev on cc) for final sign off on the uAPI +* Add pciid for DG1 and turn on uAPI for real + +New object placement and region query uAPI +========================================== +Starting from DG1 we need to give userspace the ability to allocate buffers from +device local-memory. Currently the driver supports gem_create, which can place +buffers in system memory via shmem, and the usual assortment of other +interfaces, like dumb buffers and userptr. + +To support this new capability, while also providing a uAPI which will work +beyond just DG1, we propose to offer three new bits of uAPI: + +DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS +----------------------------- +New query ID which allows userspace to discover the list of supported memory +regions(like system-memory and local-memory) for a given device. We identify +each region with a class and instance pair, which should be unique. The class +here would be DEVICE or SYSTEM, and the instance would be zero, on platforms +like DG1. + +Side note: The class/instance design is borrowed from our existing engine uAPI, +where we describe every physical engine in terms of its class, and the +particular instance, since we can have more than one per class. + +In the future we also want to expose more information which can further +describe the capabilities of a region. + +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h + :functions: drm_i915_gem_memory_class drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance drm_i915_memory_region_info drm_i915_query_memory_regions + +GEM_CREATE_EXT +-------------- +New ioctl which is basically just gem_create but now allows userspace to provide +a chain of possible extensions. Note that if we don't provide any extensions and +set flags=0 then we get the exact same behaviour as gem_create. + +Side note: We also need to support PXP[1] in the near future, which is also +applicable to integrated platforms, and adds its own gem_create_ext extension, +which basically lets userspace mark a buffer as "protected". + +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h + :functions: drm_i915_gem_create_ext + +I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS +---------------------------------- +Implemented as an extension for gem_create_ext, we would now allow userspace to +optionally provide an immutable list of preferred placements at creation time, +in priority order, for a given buffer object. For the placements we expect +them each to use the class/instance encoding, as per the output of the regions +query. Having the list in priority order will be useful in the future when +placing an object, say during eviction. + +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_gem_lmem.h + :functions: drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions + +One fair criticism here is that this seems a little over-engineered[2]. If we +just consider DG1 then yes, a simple gem_create.flags or something is totally +all that's needed to tell the kernel to allocate the buffer in local-memory or +whatever. However looking to the future we need uAPI which can also support +upcoming Xe HP multi-tile architecture in a sane way, where there can be +multiple local-memory instances for a given device, and so using both class and +instance in our uAPI to describe regions is desirable, although specifically +for DG1 it's uninteresting, since we only have a single local-memory instance. + +Existing uAPI issues +==================== +Some potential issues we still need to resolve. + +I915 MMAP +--------- +In i915 there are multiple ways to MMAP GEM object, including mapping the same +object using different mapping types(WC vs WB), i.e multiple active mmaps per +object. TTM expects one MMAP at most for the lifetime of the object. If it +turns out that we have to backpedal here, there might be some potential +userspace fallout. + +I915 SET/GET CACHING +-------------------- +In i915 we have set/get_caching ioctl. TTM doesn't let us to change this, but +DG1 doesn't support non-snooped pcie transactions, so we can just always +allocate as WB for smem-only buffers. If/when our hw gains support for +non-snooped pcie transactions then we must fix this mode at allocation time as +a new GEM extension. + +This is related to the mmap problem, because in general (meaning, when we're +not running on intel cpus) the cpu mmap must not, ever, be inconsistent with +allocation mode. + +Possible idea is to let the kernel picks the mmap mode for userspace from the +following table: + +smem-only: WB. Userspace does not need to call clflush. + +smem+lmem: We only ever allow a single mode, so simply allocate this as uncached +memory, and always give userspace a WC mapping. GPU still does snooped access +here(assuming we can't turn it off like on DG1), which is a bit inefficient. + +lmem only: always WC + +This means on discrete you only get a single mmap mode, all others must be +rejected. That's probably going to be a new default mode or something like +that. + +Links +===== +[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/86798/ + +[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/5599#note_553791 diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst index a8621f7dab8b..05670442ca1b 100644 --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst @@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ host such documentation: * Once the code has landed move all the documentation to the right places in the main core, helper or driver sections. + +.. toctree:: + + i915_gem_lmem.rst |