Merge tag 'mm-stable-2022-08-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Pull MM updates from Andrew Morton:
 "Most of the MM queue. A few things are still pending.

  Liam's maple tree rework didn't make it. This has resulted in a few
  other minor patch series being held over for next time.

  Multi-gen LRU still isn't merged as we were waiting for mapletree to
  stabilize. The current plan is to merge MGLRU into -mm soon and to
  later reintroduce mapletree, with a view to hopefully getting both
  into 6.1-rc1.

  Summary:

   - The usual batches of cleanups from Baoquan He, Muchun Song, Miaohe
     Lin, Yang Shi, Anshuman Khandual and Mike Rapoport

   - Some kmemleak fixes from Patrick Wang and Waiman Long

   - DAMON updates from SeongJae Park

   - memcg debug/visibility work from Roman Gushchin

   - vmalloc speedup from Uladzislau Rezki

   - more folio conversion work from Matthew Wilcox

   - enhancements for coherent device memory mapping from Alex Sierra

   - addition of shared pages tracking and CoW support for fsdax, from
     Shiyang Ruan

   - hugetlb optimizations from Mike Kravetz

   - Mel Gorman has contributed some pagealloc changes to improve
     latency and realtime behaviour.

   - mprotect soft-dirty checking has been improved by Peter Xu

   - Many other singleton patches all over the place"

 [ XFS merge from hell as per Darrick Wong in

   https://lore.kernel.org/all/YshKnxb4VwXycPO8@magnolia/ ]

* tag 'mm-stable-2022-08-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (282 commits)
  tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c: fix build
  mm: Kconfig: fix typo
  mm: memory-failure: convert to pr_fmt()
  mm: use is_zone_movable_page() helper
  hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in hugetlbfs_statfs()
  hugetlbfs: cleanup some comments in inode.c
  hugetlbfs: remove unneeded header file
  hugetlbfs: remove unneeded hugetlbfs_ops forward declaration
  hugetlbfs: use helper macro SZ_1{K,M}
  mm: cleanup is_highmem()
  mm/hmm: add a test for cross device private faults
  selftests: add soft-dirty into run_vmtests.sh
  selftests: soft-dirty: add test for mprotect
  mm/mprotect: fix soft-dirty check in can_change_pte_writable()
  mm: memcontrol: fix potential oom_lock recursion deadlock
  mm/gup.c: fix formatting in check_and_migrate_movable_page()
  xfs: fail dax mount if reflink is enabled on a partition
  mm/memcontrol.c: remove the redundant updating of stats_flush_threshold
  userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features
  hugetlb_cgroup: fix wrong hugetlb cgroup numa stat
  ...

1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dde7e2414ee6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+==========================
+Frequently Asked Questions
+==========================
+
+Why a new subsystem, instead of extending perf or other user space tools?
+=========================================================================
+
+First, because it needs to be lightweight as much as possible so that it can be
+used online, any unnecessary overhead such as kernel - user space context
+switching cost should be avoided.  Second, DAMON aims to be used by other
+programs including the kernel.  Therefore, having a dependency on specific
+tools like perf is not desirable.  These are the two biggest reasons why DAMON
+is implemented in the kernel space.
+
+
+Can 'idle pages tracking' or 'perf mem' substitute DAMON?
+=========================================================
+
+Idle page tracking is a low level primitive for access check of the physical
+address space.  'perf mem' is similar, though it can use sampling to minimize
+the overhead.  On the other hand, DAMON is a higher-level framework for the
+monitoring of various address spaces.  It is focused on memory management
+optimization and provides sophisticated accuracy/overhead handling mechanisms.
+Therefore, 'idle pages tracking' and 'perf mem' could provide a subset of
+DAMON's output, but cannot substitute DAMON.
+
+
+Does DAMON support virtual memory only?
+=======================================
+
+No.  The core of the DAMON is address space independent.  The address space
+specific monitoring operations including monitoring target regions
+constructions and actual access checks can be implemented and configured on the
+DAMON core by the users.  In this way, DAMON users can monitor any address
+space with any access check technique.
+
+Nonetheless, DAMON provides vma/rmap tracking and PTE Accessed bit check based
+implementations of the address space dependent functions for the virtual memory
+and the physical memory by default, for a reference and convenient use.
+
+
+Can I simply monitor page granularity?
+======================================
+
+Yes.  You can do so by setting the ``min_nr_regions`` attribute higher than the
+working set size divided by the page size.  Because the monitoring target
+regions size is forced to be ``>=page size``, the region split will make no
+effect.