summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>2018-05-11 05:52:17 +0300
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2018-06-05 11:54:53 +0300
commit68565a1af9f7012e6f2fe2bdd612f67d2d830c28 (patch)
tree536f2ee53a581e24832a250ea100c4a09635f283 /arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
parent2b589a7e2bd3eb610a4b7f5e61393481755a4de9 (diff)
downloadlinux-68565a1af9f7012e6f2fe2bdd612f67d2d830c28.tar.xz
bpf, arm32: fix inconsistent naming about emit_a32_lsr_{r64,i64}
The names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH are emit_a32_arsh_*, the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH are emit_a32_lsh_*, but the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH are emit_a32_lsr_*. For consistence reason, let's rename emit_a32_lsr_* to emit_a32_rsh_*. This patch also corrects a wrong comment. Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 0d542007b49d..6e8b71613039 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_arsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk,
}
/* dst = dst >> src */
-static inline void emit_a32_lsr_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk,
+static inline void emit_a32_rsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk,
bool sstk, struct jit_ctx *ctx) {
const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 *tmp2 = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_2];
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_lsr_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk,
emit(ARM_LDR_I(rm, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst_hi)), ctx);
}
- /* Do LSH operation */
+ /* Do RSH operation */
emit(ARM_RSB_I(ARM_IP, rt, 32), ctx);
emit(ARM_SUBS_I(tmp2[0], rt, 32), ctx);
emit(ARM_MOV_SR(ARM_LR, rd, SRTYPE_LSR, rt), ctx);
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_lsh_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk,
}
/* dst = dst >> val */
-static inline void emit_a32_lsr_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk,
+static inline void emit_a32_rsh_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk,
const u32 val, struct jit_ctx *ctx) {
const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
const u8 *tmp2 = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_2];
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K:
if (unlikely(imm > 63))
return -EINVAL;
- emit_a32_lsr_i64(dst, dstk, imm, ctx);
+ emit_a32_rsh_i64(dst, dstk, imm, ctx);
break;
/* dst = dst << src */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X:
@@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
break;
/* dst = dst >> src */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X:
- emit_a32_lsr_r64(dst, src, dstk, sstk, ctx);
+ emit_a32_rsh_r64(dst, src, dstk, sstk, ctx);
break;
/* dst = dst >> src (signed) */
case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X: