summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorReiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>2023-10-21 00:40:42 +0300
committerOliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>2023-10-25 01:59:29 +0300
commit427733579744ef22ee6d0da9907560d79d937458 (patch)
tree5adb3b554a7332cdbf78c9429d2ce5ed97a583e5 /arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
parent1616ca6f3c10723c1b60ae44724212fae88f502d (diff)
downloadlinux-427733579744ef22ee6d0da9907560d79d937458.tar.xz
KVM: arm64: Select default PMU in KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT handler
Future changes to KVM's sysreg emulation will rely on having a valid PMU instance to determine the number of implemented counters (PMCR_EL0.N). This is earlier than when userspace is expected to modify the vPMU device attributes, where the default is selected today. Select the default PMU when handling KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT such that it is available in time for sysreg emulation. Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020214053.2144305-3-rananta@google.com [Oliver: rewrite changelog] Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c16
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index fb9817bdfeb5..1eb02765dd14 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -717,10 +717,9 @@ static struct arm_pmu *kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(void)
* It is still necessary to get a valid cpu, though, to probe for the
* default PMU instance as userspace is not required to specify a PMU
* type. In order to uphold the preexisting behavior KVM selects the
- * PMU instance for the core where the first call to the
- * KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL attribute group occurs. A dependent use case
- * would be a user with disdain of all things big.LITTLE that affines
- * the VMM to a particular cluster of cores.
+ * PMU instance for the core during vcpu init. A dependent use
+ * case would be a user with disdain of all things big.LITTLE that
+ * affines the VMM to a particular cluster of cores.
*
* In any case, userspace should just do the sane thing and use the UAPI
* to select a PMU type directly. But, be wary of the baggage being
@@ -893,7 +892,7 @@ static void kvm_arm_set_pmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu)
* where vCPUs can be scheduled on any core but the guest
* counters could stop working.
*/
-static int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm)
+int kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(struct kvm *kvm)
{
struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu();
@@ -946,13 +945,6 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
if (vcpu->arch.pmu.created)
return -EBUSY;
- if (!kvm->arch.arm_pmu) {
- int ret = kvm_arm_set_default_pmu(kvm);
-
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- }
-
switch (attr->attr) {
case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;