summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYong-Xuan Wang <yongxuan.wang@sifive.com>2024-04-17 10:45:25 +0300
committerAnup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>2024-04-22 08:07:11 +0300
commit2121cadec45aaf61fa45b3aa3d99723ed4e6683a (patch)
tree4e2988e18b8011af58bca07e987a3c48d73bea6b /arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
parentf1c48c1ec73538a8e49695445a0fbc52156aac42 (diff)
downloadlinux-2121cadec45aaf61fa45b3aa3d99723ed4e6683a.tar.xz
RISCV: KVM: Introduce mp_state_lock to avoid lock inversion
Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst advises that kvm->lock should be acquired outside vcpu->mutex and kvm->srcu. However, when KVM/RISC-V handling SBI_EXT_HSM_HART_START, the lock ordering is vcpu->mutex, kvm->srcu then kvm->lock. Although the lockdep checking no longer complains about this after commit f0f44752f5f6 ("rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies"), it's necessary to replace kvm->lock with a new dedicated lock to ensure only one hart can execute the SBI_EXT_HSM_HART_START call for the target hart simultaneously. Additionally, this patch also rename "power_off" to "mp_state" with two possible values. The vcpu->mp_state_lock also protects the access of vcpu->mp_state. Signed-off-by: Yong-Xuan Wang <yongxuan.wang@sifive.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417074528.16506-2-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c48
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index f3c87f0c93ba..57d78be4e6ad 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_cpu_context *cntx;
struct kvm_vcpu_csr *reset_csr = &vcpu->arch.guest_reset_csr;
+ spin_lock_init(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+
/* Mark this VCPU never ran */
vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once = false;
vcpu->arch.mmu_page_cache.gfp_zero = __GFP_ZERO;
@@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return (kvm_riscv_vcpu_has_interrupts(vcpu, -1UL) &&
- !vcpu->arch.power_off && !vcpu->arch.pause);
+ !kvm_riscv_vcpu_stopped(vcpu) && !vcpu->arch.pause);
}
int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -429,26 +431,42 @@ bool kvm_riscv_vcpu_has_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 mask)
return kvm_riscv_vcpu_aia_has_interrupts(vcpu, mask);
}
-void kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void __kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- vcpu->arch.power_off = true;
+ WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state.mp_state, KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED);
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu);
kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
}
-void kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+ __kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+}
+
+void __kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state.mp_state, KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE);
kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
}
+void kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_on(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+ __kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_on(vcpu);
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+}
+
+bool kvm_riscv_vcpu_stopped(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state.mp_state) == KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_mp_state *mp_state)
{
- if (vcpu->arch.power_off)
- mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED;
- else
- mp_state->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
+ *mp_state = READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state);
return 0;
}
@@ -458,17 +476,21 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{
int ret = 0;
+ spin_lock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+
switch (mp_state->mp_state) {
case KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE:
- vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
+ WRITE_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state, *mp_state);
break;
case KVM_MP_STATE_STOPPED:
- kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
+ __kvm_riscv_vcpu_power_off(vcpu);
break;
default:
ret = -EINVAL;
}
+ spin_unlock(&vcpu->arch.mp_state_lock);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -596,11 +618,11 @@ static void kvm_riscv_check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu)) {
kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_unlock(vcpu);
rcuwait_wait_event(wait,
- (!vcpu->arch.power_off) && (!vcpu->arch.pause),
+ (!kvm_riscv_vcpu_stopped(vcpu)) && (!vcpu->arch.pause),
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock(vcpu);
- if (vcpu->arch.power_off || vcpu->arch.pause) {
+ if (kvm_riscv_vcpu_stopped(vcpu) || vcpu->arch.pause) {
/*
* Awaken to handle a signal, request to
* sleep again later.