summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2017-11-14 19:27:19 +0300
committerSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>2017-11-21 20:07:05 +0300
commit03e4e0a9e02cf703da331ff6cfd57d0be9bf5692 (patch)
treedc27892dd1af53bf9d6f5f1925762e7b8286f992 /drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
parent70c5f93669249886b151812076509f30569aff80 (diff)
downloadlinux-03e4e0a9e02cf703da331ff6cfd57d0be9bf5692.tar.xz
dma-buf/fence: Fix lock inversion within dma-fence-array
Ages ago Rob Clark noted, "Currently with fence-array, we have a potential deadlock situation. If we fence_add_callback() on an array-fence, the array-fence's lock is acquired first, and in it's ->enable_signaling() callback, it will install cbs on it's array-member fences, so the array-member's lock is acquired second. But in the signal path, the array-member's lock is acquired first, and the array-fence's lock acquired second." Rob proposed either extensive changes to dma-fence to unnest the fence-array signaling, or to defer the signaling onto a workqueue. This is a more refined version of the later, that should keep the latency of the fence signaling to a minimum by using an irq-work, which is executed asap. Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> References: 1476635975-21981-1-git-send-email-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114162719.30958-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c14
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
index 0350829ba62e..dd1edfb27b61 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
@@ -31,6 +31,14 @@ static const char *dma_fence_array_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
return "unbound";
}
+static void irq_dma_fence_array_work(struct irq_work *wrk)
+{
+ struct dma_fence_array *array = container_of(wrk, typeof(*array), work);
+
+ dma_fence_signal(&array->base);
+ dma_fence_put(&array->base);
+}
+
static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
{
@@ -39,8 +47,9 @@ static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_array *array = array_cb->array;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&array->num_pending))
- dma_fence_signal(&array->base);
- dma_fence_put(&array->base);
+ irq_work_queue(&array->work);
+ else
+ dma_fence_put(&array->base);
}
static bool dma_fence_array_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
@@ -136,6 +145,7 @@ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences,
spin_lock_init(&array->lock);
dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, &array->lock,
context, seqno);
+ init_irq_work(&array->work, irq_dma_fence_array_work);
array->num_fences = num_fences;
atomic_set(&array->num_pending, signal_on_any ? 1 : num_fences);