diff options
| author | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> | 2019-09-13 13:04:07 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> | 2019-09-16 10:20:05 +0300 |
| commit | a2b69ea4d26d1077b00924ff34e46b28d997aae2 (patch) | |
| tree | bce636781689c57d60cb2b9b436cbe7a6c40108b /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h | |
| parent | 2f7155629c9dd4d4ed0c2ec95a8982c84882b9e2 (diff) | |
| download | linux-a2b69ea4d26d1077b00924ff34e46b28d997aae2.tar.xz | |
drm/i915: introduce INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED()
Prepare for making a distinction between not having display and having
disabled display. Add INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() and use it where
HAS_DISPLAY() is used after intel_device_info_runtime_init(). This is
initially duplication, as disabling display still leads to ->pipe_mask =
0 and HAS_DISPLAY() being false.
Note that ever since i915.display_disable was introduced, it has not
affected PCH detection even if it uses HAS_DISPLAY(), as display disable
happens after that.
Since INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() will not make sense unless HAS_DISPLAY()
is true, include a warning for catching misuses making decisions on
INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() when HAS_DISPLAY() is false.
v2: Remove INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() check from intel_detect_pch() (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190913100407.30991-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions