drm/i915: replace IS_GEN<N> with IS_GEN(..., N)

Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.

The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:

@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)

v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
    using the bitmask

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index f29a7ff7c362..2f756a97689a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int i915_adjust_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		resource_size_t ggtt_start;
 
 		ggtt_start = I915_READ(PGTBL_CTL);
-		if (IS_GEN4(dev_priv))
+		if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 4))
 			ggtt_start = (ggtt_start & PGTBL_ADDRESS_LO_MASK) |
 				     (ggtt_start & PGTBL_ADDRESS_HI_MASK) << 28;
 		else
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int i915_adjust_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		 * GEN3 firmware likes to smash pci bridges into the stolen
 		 * range. Apparently this works.
 		 */
-		if (r == NULL && !IS_GEN3(dev_priv)) {
+		if (r == NULL && !IS_GEN(dev_priv, 3)) {
 			DRM_ERROR("conflict detected with stolen region: %pR\n",
 				  dsm);
 
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static void g4x_get_stolen_reserved(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 * Whether ILK really reuses the ELK register for this is unclear.
 	 * Let's see if we catch anyone with this supposedly enabled on ILK.
 	 */
-	WARN(IS_GEN5(dev_priv), "ILK stolen reserved found? 0x%08x\n", reg_val);
+	WARN(IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5), "ILK stolen reserved found? 0x%08x\n",
+	     reg_val);
 
 	if (!(reg_val & G4X_STOLEN_RESERVED_ADDR2_MASK))
 		return;