summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2019-10-18 10:20:27 +0300
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>2019-10-18 13:23:26 +0300
commit253a774bb08b549488047c3fb4afc0faf6f194ae (patch)
tree963f11a4dee36332585aee7b70d9c35f72f4ade6 /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
parentfb26eee0600dbd6b2eb20356b7d425cb71413ea2 (diff)
downloadlinux-253a774bb08b549488047c3fb4afc0faf6f194ae.tar.xz
drm/i915/execlists: Don't merely skip submission if maybe timeslicing
Normally, we try and skip submission if ELSP[1] is filled. However, we may desire to enable timeslicing due to the queue priority, even if ELSP[1] itself does not require timeslicing. That is the queue is equal priority to ELSP[0] and higher priority then ELSP[1]. Previously, we would wait until the context switch to preempt the current ELSP[1], but with timeslicing, we want to preempt ELSP[0] and replace it with the queue. In writing the test case, it become quickly apparent that we were also suppressing the tasklet during promotion and so failing to notice when the queue started requiring timeslicing. Fixes: 2229adc81380 ("drm/i915/execlist: Trim immediate timeslice expiry") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018072027.31948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h18
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
index 7eefccff39bf..07d243acf553 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
@@ -52,22 +52,4 @@ static inline void i915_priolist_free(struct i915_priolist *p)
__i915_priolist_free(p);
}
-static inline bool i915_scheduler_need_preempt(int prio, int active)
-{
- /*
- * Allow preemption of low -> normal -> high, but we do
- * not allow low priority tasks to preempt other low priority
- * tasks under the impression that latency for low priority
- * tasks does not matter (as much as background throughput),
- * so kiss.
- *
- * More naturally we would write
- * prio >= max(0, last);
- * except that we wish to prevent triggering preemption at the same
- * priority level: the task that is running should remain running
- * to preserve FIFO ordering of dependencies.
- */
- return prio > max(I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL - 1, active);
-}
-
#endif /* _I915_SCHEDULER_H_ */