diff options
| author | Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> | 2023-03-15 14:31:33 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-04-06 05:42:46 +0300 |
| commit | 23baf831a32c04f9a968812511540b1b3e648bf5 (patch) | |
| tree | fcaca52cefbef2707710ce057f58fb1c955a0559 /drivers/md | |
| parent | 61883d3c32418f16e35e030ca0cfd5d2de95a649 (diff) | |
| download | linux-23baf831a32c04f9a968812511540b1b3e648bf5.tar.xz | |
mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely
MAX_ORDER currently defined as number of orders page allocator supports:
user can ask buddy allocator for page order between 0 and MAX_ORDER-1.
This definition is counter-intuitive and lead to number of bugs all over
the kernel.
Change the definition of MAX_ORDER to be inclusive: the range of orders
user can ask from buddy allocator is 0..MAX_ORDER now.
[kirill@shutemov.name: fix min() warning]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315153800.32wib3n5rickolvh@box
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix another min_t warning]
[kirill@shutemov.name: fixups per Zi Yan]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230316232144.b7ic4cif4kjiabws@box.shutemov.name
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix underlining in docs]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191025.VRCTk6mP-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315113133.11326-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [powerpc]
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/md')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c index cf077f9b30c3..733053c2eaa0 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static void __cache_size_refresh(void) * If the allocation may fail we use __get_free_pages. Memory fragmentation * won't have a fatal effect here, but it just causes flushes of some other * buffers and more I/O will be performed. Don't use __get_free_pages if it - * always fails (i.e. order >= MAX_ORDER). + * always fails (i.e. order > MAX_ORDER). * * If the allocation shouldn't fail we use __vmalloc. This is only for the * initial reserve allocation, so there's no risk of wasting all vmalloc |