diff options
| author | Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> | 2021-02-25 13:27:53 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> | 2021-06-10 03:20:05 +0300 |
| commit | 7a545077cb6701957e84c7f158630bb5c984e648 (patch) | |
| tree | 69e9afb87043f36a51948f79b171969b8db30e02 /drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | |
| parent | a6ee6f5f1082c416f9bfffbae1a87feff8a6ab3d (diff) | |
| download | linux-7a545077cb6701957e84c7f158630bb5c984e648.tar.xz | |
Revert "net/mlx5: Arm only EQs with EQEs"
In the scenario described below, an EQ can remain in FIRED state which
can result in missing an interrupt generation.
The scenario:
device mlx5_core driver
------ ----------------
EQ1.eqe generated
EQ1.MSI-X sent
EQ1.state = FIRED
EQ2.eqe generated
mlx5_irq()
polls - eq1_eqes()
arm eq1
polls - eq2_eqes()
arm eq2
EQ2.MSI-X sent
EQ2.state = FIRED
mlx5_irq()
polls - eq2_eqes() -- no eqes found
driver skips EQ arming;
->EQ2 remains fired, misses generating interrupt.
Hence, always arm the EQ by reverting the cited commit in fixes tag.
Fixes: d894892dda25 ("net/mlx5: Arm only EQs with EQEs")
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c index 77c0ca655975..940333410267 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int mlx5_eq_comp_int(struct notifier_block *nb, eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq); if (!eqe) - return 0; + goto out; do { struct mlx5_core_cq *cq; @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ static int mlx5_eq_comp_int(struct notifier_block *nb, ++eq->cons_index; } while ((++num_eqes < MLX5_EQ_POLLING_BUDGET) && (eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq))); + +out: eq_update_ci(eq, 1); if (cqn != -1) @@ -248,9 +250,9 @@ static int mlx5_eq_async_int(struct notifier_block *nb, ++eq->cons_index; } while ((++num_eqes < MLX5_EQ_POLLING_BUDGET) && (eqe = next_eqe_sw(eq))); - eq_update_ci(eq, 1); out: + eq_update_ci(eq, 1); mlx5_eq_async_int_unlock(eq_async, recovery, &flags); return unlikely(recovery) ? num_eqes : 0; |