diff options
| author | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2023-06-20 13:04:02 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2023-07-27 09:50:36 +0300 |
| commit | 6862557e9afeb181058766e378b796a4075ca396 (patch) | |
| tree | 4463fd743f7d0972873e2aaf9fc47dcd3fc05356 /drivers/net/wireless | |
| parent | a46a6249146093c15028883c10d084324d658e87 (diff) | |
| download | linux-6862557e9afeb181058766e378b796a4075ca396.tar.xz | |
wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: avoid baid size integer overflow
[ Upstream commit 1a528ab1da324d078ec60283c34c17848580df24 ]
Roee reported various hard-to-debug crashes with pings in
EHT aggregation scenarios. Enabling KASAN showed that we
access the BAID allocation out of bounds, and looking at
the code a bit shows that since the reorder buffer entry
(struct iwl_mvm_reorder_buf_entry) is 128 bytes if debug
such as lockdep is enabled, then staring from an agg size
512 we overflow the size calculation, and allocate a much
smaller structure than we should, causing slab corruption
once we initialize this.
Fix this by simply using u32 instead of u16.
Reported-by: Roee Goldfiner <roee.h.goldfiner@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230620125813.f428c856030d.I2c2bb808e945adb71bc15f5b2bac2d8957ea90eb@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c index 013aca70c3d3..6b52afcf0272 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c @@ -2738,7 +2738,7 @@ int iwl_mvm_sta_rx_agg(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, } if (iwl_mvm_has_new_rx_api(mvm) && start) { - u16 reorder_buf_size = buf_size * sizeof(baid_data->entries[0]); + u32 reorder_buf_size = buf_size * sizeof(baid_data->entries[0]); /* sparse doesn't like the __align() so don't check */ #ifndef __CHECKER__ |