summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/tty
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>2024-01-03 09:18:14 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2024-01-04 18:26:10 +0300
commit4afeced55baa391490b61ed9164867e2927353ed (patch)
treec38e5fe32a7e42c68b5293c106fd0783e22f42eb /drivers/tty
parent1a33e33ca0e80d485458410f149265cdc0178cfa (diff)
downloadlinux-4afeced55baa391490b61ed9164867e2927353ed.tar.xz
serial: core: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings
Among other things uart_sanitize_serial_rs485() tests the sanity of the RTS settings in a RS485 configuration that has been passed by userspace. If RTS-on-send and RTS-after-send are both set or unset the configuration is adjusted and RTS-after-send is disabled and RTS-on-send enabled. This however makes only sense if both RTS modes are actually supported by the driver. With commit be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct") the code does take the driver support into account but only checks if one of both RTS modes are supported. This may lead to the errorneous result of RTS-on-send being set even if only RTS-after-send is supported. Fix this by changing the implemented logic: First clear all unsupported flags in the RS485 configuration, then adjust an invalid RTS setting by taking into account which RTS mode is supported. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct") Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103061818.564-4-l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/tty')
-rw-r--r--drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c28
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index 850f24cc53e5..cd8c3a70455e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1376,19 +1376,27 @@ static void uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_rs4
return;
}
+ rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+
/* Pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
- if ((supported_flags & (SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) &&
- !(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
+ if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
- dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
- "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
- port->name, port->line);
- rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
- rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- supported_flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- }
+ if (supported_flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) {
+ rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+ rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+ "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
+ port->name, port->line);
+ } else {
+ rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
+ rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+ "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_AFTER_SEND instead\n",
+ port->name, port->line);
+ }
+ }
uart_sanitize_serial_rs485_delays(port, rs485);