pwm: Provide an inline function to get the parent device of a given chip

[ Upstream commit 4e59267c7a20eb1c1ad9106e682cb6a0d8eb3111 ]

Currently a pwm_chip stores in its struct device *dev member a pointer
to the parent device. Preparing a change that embeds a full struct
device in struct pwm_chip, this accessor function should be used in all
drivers directly accessing chip->dev now. This way struct pwm_chip and
this new function can be changed without having to touch all drivers in
the same change set.

Make use of this function in the framework's core sources.

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cc30090d2f9762bed9854a55612144bccc910781.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Stable-dep-of: 3e551115aee0 ("pwm: meson: Add check for error from clk_round_rate()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

2 files changed, 23 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 1b4c3d0caa82..830a697826af 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 	if (s2.polarity != state->polarity &&
 	    state->duty_cycle < state->period)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev, ".apply ignored .polarity\n");
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply ignored .polarity\n");
 
 	if (state->enabled &&
 	    last->polarity == state->polarity &&
 	    last->period > s2.period &&
 	    last->period <= state->period)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n",
 			 state->period, s2.period, last->period);
 
 	if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n",
 			 state->period, s2.period);
 
@@ -91,20 +91,20 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	    last->period == s2.period &&
 	    last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle &&
 	    last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n",
 			 state->duty_cycle, state->period,
 			 s2.duty_cycle, s2.period,
 			 last->duty_cycle, last->period);
 
 	if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n",
 			 state->duty_cycle, state->period,
 			 s2.duty_cycle, s2.period);
 
 	if (!state->enabled && s2.enabled && s2.duty_cycle > 0)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 "requested disabled, but yielded enabled with duty > 0\n");
 
 	/* reapply the state that the driver reported being configured. */
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	trace_pwm_apply(pwm, &s1, err);
 	if (err) {
 		*last = s1;
-		dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to reapply current setting\n");
+		dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "failed to reapply current setting\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	    s1.polarity != last->polarity ||
 	    (s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) ||
 	    (s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) {
-		dev_err(chip->dev,
+		dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n",
 			s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period,
 			last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle,
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *pwmchip_find_by_name(const char *name)
 	mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
 
 	idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id) {
-		const char *chip_name = dev_name(chip->dev);
+		const char *chip_name = dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip));
 
 		if (chip_name && strcmp(chip_name, name) == 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
@@ -456,19 +456,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pwm_single_xlate);
 
 static void of_pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip)
 {
-	if (!chip->dev || !chip->dev->of_node)
+	if (!pwmchip_parent(chip) || !pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node)
 		return;
 
 	if (!chip->of_xlate)
 		chip->of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
 
-	of_node_get(chip->dev->of_node);
+	of_node_get(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node);
 }
 
 static void of_pwmchip_remove(struct pwm_chip *chip)
 {
-	if (chip->dev)
-		of_node_put(chip->dev->of_node);
+	if (pwmchip_parent(chip))
+		of_node_put(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node);
 }
 
 static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip)
 		return false;
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_DEBUG) && !ops->get_state)
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 "Please implement the .get_state() callback\n");
 
 	return true;
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int __pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct module *owner)
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
+	if (!chip || !pwmchip_parent(chip) || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (!pwm_ops_check(chip))
@@ -594,15 +594,15 @@ static struct device_link *pwm_device_link_add(struct device *dev,
 		 * impact the PM sequence ordering: the PWM supplier may get
 		 * suspended before the consumer.
 		 */
-		dev_warn(pwm->chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip),
 			 "No consumer device specified to create a link to\n");
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	dl = device_link_add(dev, pwm->chip->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
+	dl = device_link_add(dev, pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip), DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
 	if (!dl) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
-			dev_name(pwm->chip->dev));
+			dev_name(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip)));
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *fwnode_to_pwmchip(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
 	mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
 
 	idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id)
-		if (chip->dev && device_match_fwnode(chip->dev, fwnode)) {
+		if (pwmchip_parent(chip) && device_match_fwnode(pwmchip_parent(chip), fwnode)) {
 			mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock);
 			return chip;
 		}
@@ -1085,8 +1085,8 @@ static int pwm_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 
 	seq_printf(s, "%s%d: %s/%s, %d PWM device%s\n",
 		   (char *)s->private, chip->id,
-		   chip->dev->bus ? chip->dev->bus->name : "no-bus",
-		   dev_name(chip->dev), chip->npwm,
+		   pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus ? pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus->name : "no-bus",
+		   dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip)), chip->npwm,
 		   (chip->npwm != 1) ? "s" : "");
 
 	pwm_dbg_show(chip, s);
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
index 1698609d91c8..3f434a771fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c
@@ -509,10 +509,10 @@ void pwmchip_sysfs_export(struct pwm_chip *chip)
 	 * If device_create() fails the pwm_chip is still usable by
 	 * the kernel it's just not exported.
 	 */
-	parent = device_create(&pwm_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
+	parent = device_create(&pwm_class, pwmchip_parent(chip), MKDEV(0, 0), chip,
 			       "pwmchip%d", chip->id);
 	if (IS_ERR(parent)) {
-		dev_warn(chip->dev,
+		dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
 			 "device_create failed for pwm_chip sysfs export\n");
 	}
 }