diff options
author | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> | 2017-10-23 03:53:49 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-11-03 17:00:34 +0300 |
commit | 3ac5a675caf4dde2788a7a1ac32b95986bffe901 (patch) | |
tree | 24af0d4ea5f7ef0a1592e2ccaebdedbcdefa3ffa /drivers | |
parent | 60751d49e0a7fe93b8467bd8c50101cc9367c605 (diff) | |
download | linux-3ac5a675caf4dde2788a7a1ac32b95986bffe901.tar.xz |
staging: lustre: ldlm: tidy list walking in ldlm_flock()
Use list_for_each_entry variants to
avoid the explicit list_entry() calls.
This allows us to use list_for_each_entry_safe_from()
instread of adding a local list-walking macro.
Also improve some comments so that it is more obvious
that the locks are sorted per-owner and that we need
to find the insertion point.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c index b911352c5347..7b90f8ef89d7 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c @@ -59,17 +59,6 @@ #include <linux/list.h> #include "ldlm_internal.h" -/** - * list_for_remaining_safe - iterate over the remaining entries in a list - * and safeguard against removal of a list entry. - * \param pos the &struct list_head to use as a loop counter. pos MUST - * have been initialized prior to using it in this macro. - * \param n another &struct list_head to use as temporary storage - * \param head the head for your list. - */ -#define list_for_remaining_safe(pos, n, head) \ - for (n = pos->next; pos != (head); pos = n, n = pos->next) - static inline int ldlm_same_flock_owner(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new) { @@ -125,8 +114,8 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req) { struct ldlm_resource *res = req->l_resource; struct ldlm_namespace *ns = ldlm_res_to_ns(res); - struct list_head *tmp; - struct list_head *ownlocks = NULL; + struct ldlm_lock *tmp; + struct ldlm_lock *ownlocks = NULL; struct ldlm_lock *lock = NULL; struct ldlm_lock *new = req; struct ldlm_lock *new2 = NULL; @@ -151,23 +140,23 @@ reprocess: /* This loop determines where this processes locks start * in the resource lr_granted list. */ - list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) { - lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, - l_res_link); + list_for_each_entry(lock, &res->lr_granted, l_res_link) { if (ldlm_same_flock_owner(lock, req)) { - ownlocks = tmp; + ownlocks = lock; break; } } - /* Scan the locks owned by this process that overlap this request. + /* Scan the locks owned by this process to find the insertion point + * (as locks are ordered), and to handle overlaps. * We may have to merge or split existing locks. */ - if (!ownlocks) - ownlocks = &res->lr_granted; - - list_for_remaining_safe(ownlocks, tmp, &res->lr_granted) { - lock = list_entry(ownlocks, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link); + if (ownlocks) + lock = ownlocks; + else + lock = list_entry(&res->lr_granted, + struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link); + list_for_each_entry_safe_from(lock, tmp, &res->lr_granted, l_res_link) { if (!ldlm_same_flock_owner(lock, new)) break; @@ -295,7 +284,7 @@ reprocess: lock->l_granted_mode); /* insert new2 at lock */ - ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, ownlocks, new2); + ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &lock->l_res_link, new2); LDLM_LOCK_RELEASE(new2); break; } @@ -309,8 +298,12 @@ reprocess: if (!added) { list_del_init(&req->l_res_link); - /* insert new lock before ownlocks in list. */ - ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, ownlocks, req); + /* insert new lock before "lock", which might be the + * next lock for this owner, or might be the first + * lock for the next owner, or might not be a lock at + * all, but instead points at the head of the list + */ + ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &lock->l_res_link, req); } /* In case we're reprocessing the requested lock we can't destroy |