summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/jbd2
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2015-06-27 19:41:50 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2015-06-27 19:41:50 +0300
commitebeaa8ddb3663b5c6cfc205605c35116381550c5 (patch)
tree47b9548dc8d0199625a8cb0ab7e8a3b567516549 /fs/jbd2
parente0dd880a545c36bd56489a97bb1d337cb873a9d5 (diff)
downloadlinux-ebeaa8ddb3663b5c6cfc205605c35116381550c5.tar.xz
Revert "jbd2: speedup jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata()"
This reverts commit 2143c1965a761332ae417b22fd477b636e4f54ec. This commit seems to be the cause of the following jbd2 assertion failure: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1325! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: bnep bluetooth fuse ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 nf_conntrack_ipv6 ... CPU: 7 PID: 5509 Comm: gcc Not tainted 4.1.0-10944-g2a298679b411 #1 Hardware name: /DH87RL, BIOS RLH8710H.86A.0327.2014.0924.1645 09/24/2014 task: ffff8803bf866040 ti: ffff880308528000 task.ti: ffff880308528000 RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x237/0x290 Call Trace: __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0x43/0x1f0 ext4_handle_dirty_dirent_node+0xde/0x160 ? jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x36/0x50 ext4_delete_entry+0x112/0x160 ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x52/0xb0 ext4_unlink+0xfa/0x260 vfs_unlink+0xec/0x190 do_unlinkat+0x24a/0x270 SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a ---[ end trace ae033ebde8d080b4 ]--- which is not easily reproducible (I've seen it just once, and then Ted was able to reproduce it once). Revert it while Ted and Jan try to figure out what is wrong. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd2')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd2/transaction.c33
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index cbe8b3aece5b..f3d06174b051 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1280,6 +1280,8 @@ void jbd2_buffer_abort_trigger(struct journal_head *jh,
triggers->t_abort(triggers, jh2bh(jh));
}
+
+
/**
* int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() - mark a buffer as containing dirty metadata
* @handle: transaction to add buffer to.
@@ -1312,36 +1314,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
return -EROFS;
- if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
+ journal = transaction->t_journal;
+ jh = jbd2_journal_grab_journal_head(bh);
+ if (!jh) {
ret = -EUCLEAN;
goto out;
}
- /*
- * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
- * of the running transaction.
- */
- jh = bh2jh(bh);
- J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == transaction ||
- jh->b_next_transaction == transaction);
- if (jh->b_modified == 1) {
- /*
- * If it's in our transaction it must be in BJ_Metadata list.
- * The assertion is unreliable since we may see jh in
- * inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this
- * is crutial to catch bugs so let's do a reliable check until
- * the lockless handling is fully proven.
- */
- if (jh->b_transaction == transaction &&
- jh->b_jlist != BJ_Metadata) {
- jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
- J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction != transaction ||
- jh->b_jlist == BJ_Metadata);
- jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
- }
- goto out;
- }
-
- journal = transaction->t_journal;
jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
@@ -1432,6 +1410,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
out_unlock_bh:
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+ jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
out:
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "exit");
return ret;