diff options
author | Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> | 2020-07-24 01:28:09 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> | 2020-07-24 01:48:05 +0300 |
commit | 41206a073ceebc517245677a19f52ba6379b33a9 (patch) | |
tree | 2fc35aac6abe32b99058ad55b0fc6e4d449d1056 /fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | |
parent | 206739119508d5ab4b42ab480ff61a7e6cd72d7c (diff) | |
parent | ba47d845d715a010f7b51f6f89bae32845e6acb7 (diff) | |
download | linux-41206a073ceebc517245677a19f52ba6379b33a9.tar.xz |
Merge v5.8-rc6 into drm-next
I've got a silent conflict + two trees based on fixes to merge.
Fixes a silent merge with amdgpu
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index e32717fd1169..2e2dac29a9e9 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -774,6 +774,14 @@ static void nfs4_slot_sequence_acked(struct nfs4_slot *slot, slot->seq_nr_last_acked = seqnr; } +static void nfs4_probe_sequence(struct nfs_client *client, const struct cred *cred, + struct nfs4_slot *slot) +{ + struct rpc_task *task = _nfs41_proc_sequence(client, cred, slot, true); + if (!IS_ERR(task)) + rpc_put_task_async(task); +} + static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_sequence_res *res) { @@ -790,6 +798,7 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct rpc_task *task, goto out; session = slot->table->session; + clp = session->clp; trace_nfs4_sequence_done(session, res); @@ -804,7 +813,6 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct rpc_task *task, nfs4_slot_sequence_acked(slot, slot->seq_nr); /* Update the slot's sequence and clientid lease timer */ slot->seq_done = 1; - clp = session->clp; do_renew_lease(clp, res->sr_timestamp); /* Check sequence flags */ nfs41_handle_sequence_flag_errors(clp, res->sr_status_flags, @@ -852,10 +860,18 @@ static int nfs41_sequence_process(struct rpc_task *task, /* * Were one or more calls using this slot interrupted? * If the server never received the request, then our - * transmitted slot sequence number may be too high. + * transmitted slot sequence number may be too high. However, + * if the server did receive the request then it might + * accidentally give us a reply with a mismatched operation. + * We can sort this out by sending a lone sequence operation + * to the server on the same slot. */ if ((s32)(slot->seq_nr - slot->seq_nr_last_acked) > 1) { slot->seq_nr--; + if (task->tk_msg.rpc_proc != &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_SEQUENCE]) { + nfs4_probe_sequence(clp, task->tk_msg.rpc_cred, slot); + res->sr_slot = NULL; + } goto retry_nowait; } /* |