summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>2009-03-30 22:02:21 +0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2009-03-30 23:16:36 +0400
commit45b03d5e8e674eb6555b767e1c8eb40b671ff892 (patch)
treed74acd1be7f5102143df960e8cd692aadcc437df /fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
parent1d889d9958490888b3fad1d486145d9a03559cbc (diff)
downloadlinux-45b03d5e8e674eb6555b767e1c8eb40b671ff892.tar.xz
reiserfs: rework reiserfs_warning
ReiserFS warnings can be somewhat inconsistent. In some cases: * a unique identifier may be associated with it * the function name may be included * the device may be printed separately This patch aims to make warnings more consistent. reiserfs_warning() prints the device name, so printing it a second time is not required. The function name for a warning is always helpful in debugging, so it is now automatically inserted into the output. Hans has stated that every warning should have a unique identifier. Some cases lack them, others really shouldn't have them. reiserfs_warning() now expects an id associated with each message. In the rare case where one isn't needed, "" will suffice. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c52
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
index 98b92a3da14a..51b116103041 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
unsigned int bmap_count = reiserfs_bmap_count(s);
if (block == 0 || block >= SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s)) {
- reiserfs_warning(s,
- "vs-4010: is_reusable: block number is out of range %lu (%u)",
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4010",
+ "block number is out of range %lu (%u)",
block, SB_BLOCK_COUNT(s));
return 0;
}
@@ -79,30 +79,29 @@ int is_reusable(struct super_block *s, b_blocknr_t block, int bit_value)
b_blocknr_t bmap1 = REISERFS_SB(s)->s_sbh->b_blocknr + 1;
if (block >= bmap1 &&
block <= bmap1 + bmap_count) {
- reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4019: is_reusable: "
- "bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4019", "bitmap block %lu(%u) "
+ "can't be freed or reused",
block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
} else {
if (offset == 0) {
- reiserfs_warning(s, "vs: 4020: is_reusable: "
- "bitmap block %lu(%u) can't be freed or reused",
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4020", "bitmap block %lu(%u) "
+ "can't be freed or reused",
block, bmap_count);
return 0;
}
}
if (bmap >= bmap_count) {
- reiserfs_warning(s,
- "vs-4030: is_reusable: there is no so many bitmap blocks: "
- "block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u", block, bmap);
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4030", "bitmap for requested block "
+ "is out of range: block=%lu, bitmap_nr=%u",
+ block, bmap);
return 0;
}
if (bit_value == 0 && block == SB_ROOT_BLOCK(s)) {
- reiserfs_warning(s,
- "vs-4050: is_reusable: this is root block (%u), "
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4050", "this is root block (%u), "
"it must be busy", SB_ROOT_BLOCK(s));
return 0;
}
@@ -154,8 +153,8 @@ static int scan_bitmap_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
/* - I mean `a window of zero bits' as in description of this function - Zam. */
if (!bi) {
- reiserfs_warning(s, "NULL bitmap info pointer for bitmap %d",
- bmap_n);
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "jdm-4055", "NULL bitmap info pointer "
+ "for bitmap %d", bmap_n);
return 0;
}
@@ -400,11 +399,8 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
get_bit_address(s, block, &nr, &offset);
if (nr >= reiserfs_bmap_count(s)) {
- reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075: reiserfs_free_block: "
- "block %lu is out of range on %s "
- "(nr=%u,max=%u)", block,
- reiserfs_bdevname(s), nr,
- reiserfs_bmap_count(s));
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4075", "block %lu is out of range",
+ block);
return;
}
@@ -416,9 +412,8 @@ static void _reiserfs_free_block(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
/* clear bit for the given block in bit map */
if (!reiserfs_test_and_clear_le_bit(offset, bmbh->b_data)) {
- reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4080: reiserfs_free_block: "
- "free_block (%s:%lu)[dev:blocknr]: bit already cleared",
- reiserfs_bdevname(s), block);
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "vs-4080",
+ "block %lu: bit already cleared", block);
}
apbi[nr].free_count++;
journal_mark_dirty(th, s, bmbh);
@@ -477,9 +472,8 @@ static void __discard_prealloc(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th,
BUG_ON(!th->t_trans_id);
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (ei->i_prealloc_count < 0)
- reiserfs_warning(th->t_super,
- "zam-4001:%s: inode has negative prealloc blocks count.",
- __func__);
+ reiserfs_warning(th->t_super, "zam-4001",
+ "inode has negative prealloc blocks count.");
#endif
while (ei->i_prealloc_count > 0) {
reiserfs_free_prealloc_block(th, inode, ei->i_prealloc_block);
@@ -515,9 +509,9 @@ void reiserfs_discard_all_prealloc(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th)
i_prealloc_list);
#ifdef CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK
if (!ei->i_prealloc_count) {
- reiserfs_warning(th->t_super,
- "zam-4001:%s: inode is in prealloc list but has no preallocated blocks.",
- __func__);
+ reiserfs_warning(th->t_super, "zam-4001",
+ "inode is in prealloc list but has "
+ "no preallocated blocks.");
}
#endif
__discard_prealloc(th, ei);
@@ -631,8 +625,8 @@ int reiserfs_parse_alloc_options(struct super_block *s, char *options)
continue;
}
- reiserfs_warning(s, "zam-4001: %s : unknown option - %s",
- __func__, this_char);
+ reiserfs_warning(s, "zam-4001", "unknown option - %s",
+ this_char);
return 1;
}