summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/userfaultfd.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2017-06-20 13:06:46 +0300
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2017-06-20 13:19:14 +0300
commit2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921 (patch)
tree6aec7243076aab2d4d239f03e34598752ce1512a /fs/userfaultfd.c
parent5822a454d6d22297c5fcd66264120587b2ec21cd (diff)
downloadlinux-2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921.tar.xz
sched/wait: Disambiguate wq_entry->task_list and wq_head->task_list naming
So I've noticed a number of instances where it was not obvious from the code whether ->task_list was for a wait-queue head or a wait-queue entry. Furthermore, there's a number of wait-queue users where the lists are not for 'tasks' but other entities (poll tables, etc.), in which case the 'task_list' name is actively confusing. To clear this all up, name the wait-queue head and entry list structure fields unambiguously: struct wait_queue_head::task_list => ::head struct wait_queue_entry::task_list => ::entry For example, this code: rqw->wait.task_list.next != &wait->task_list ... is was pretty unclear (to me) what it's doing, while now it's written this way: rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry ... which makes it pretty clear that we are iterating a list until we see the head. Other examples are: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->task_list, task_list) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.task_list, task_list) { ... where it's unclear (to me) what we are iterating, and during review it's hard to tell whether it's trying to walk a wait-queue entry (which would be a bug), while now it's written as: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->head, entry) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.head, entry) { Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/userfaultfd.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/userfaultfd.c22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index bda64fcd8a0c..6148ccd6cccf 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_wake_function(wait_queue_entry_t *wq, unsigned mode,
* wouldn't be enough, the smp_mb__before_spinlock is
* enough to avoid an explicit smp_mb() here.
*/
- list_del_init(&wq->task_list);
+ list_del_init(&wq->entry);
out:
return ret;
}
@@ -522,13 +522,13 @@ int handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
* and it's fine not to block on the spinlock. The uwq on this
* kernel stack can be released after the list_del_init.
*/
- if (!list_empty_careful(&uwq.wq.task_list)) {
+ if (!list_empty_careful(&uwq.wq.entry)) {
spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/*
* No need of list_del_init(), the uwq on the stack
* will be freed shortly anyway.
*/
- list_del(&uwq.wq.task_list);
+ list_del(&uwq.wq.entry);
spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
}
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ static inline struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *find_userfault_in(
if (!waitqueue_active(wqh))
goto out;
/* walk in reverse to provide FIFO behavior to read userfaults */
- wq = list_last_entry(&wqh->task_list, typeof(*wq), task_list);
+ wq = list_last_entry(&wqh->head, typeof(*wq), entry);
uwq = container_of(wq, struct userfaultfd_wait_queue, wq);
out:
return uwq;
@@ -1003,14 +1003,14 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
* changes __remove_wait_queue() to use
* list_del_init() in turn breaking the
* !list_empty_careful() check in
- * handle_userfault(). The uwq->wq.task_list
+ * handle_userfault(). The uwq->wq.head list
* must never be empty at any time during the
* refile, or the waitqueue could disappear
* from under us. The "wait_queue_head_t"
* parameter of __remove_wait_queue() is unused
* anyway.
*/
- list_del(&uwq->wq.task_list);
+ list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
__add_wait_queue(&ctx->fault_wqh, &uwq->wq);
write_seqcount_end(&ctx->refile_seq);
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
fork_nctx = (struct userfaultfd_ctx *)
(unsigned long)
uwq->msg.arg.reserved.reserved1;
- list_move(&uwq->wq.task_list, &fork_event);
+ list_move(&uwq->wq.entry, &fork_event);
spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
ret = 0;
break;
@@ -1069,8 +1069,8 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
if (!list_empty(&fork_event)) {
uwq = list_first_entry(&fork_event,
typeof(*uwq),
- wq.task_list);
- list_del(&uwq->wq.task_list);
+ wq.entry);
+ list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
__add_wait_queue(&ctx->event_wqh, &uwq->wq);
userfaultfd_event_complete(ctx, uwq);
}
@@ -1752,12 +1752,12 @@ static void userfaultfd_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
unsigned long pending = 0, total = 0;
spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
- list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_pending_wqh.task_list, task_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_pending_wqh.head, entry) {
uwq = container_of(wq, struct userfaultfd_wait_queue, wq);
pending++;
total++;
}
- list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_wqh.task_list, task_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_wqh.head, entry) {
uwq = container_of(wq, struct userfaultfd_wait_queue, wq);
total++;
}