summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/io_uring/io-wq.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2023-01-21 06:50:24 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2023-01-24 09:19:56 +0300
commit2fd232bbd66fafdf7af3cc155c7bb82d96d07bc9 (patch)
tree1fb8888bdedb3884ed530ed76a2e03088f13ff31 /io_uring/io-wq.c
parente84ec6e25df9bb0968599e92eacedaf3a0a5b587 (diff)
downloadlinux-2fd232bbd66fafdf7af3cc155c7bb82d96d07bc9.tar.xz
io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
commit 46a525e199e4037516f7e498c18f065b09df32ac upstream. This isn't a reliable mechanism to tell if we have task_work pending, we really should be looking at whether we have any items queued. This is problematic if forward progress is gated on running said task_work. One such example is reading from a pipe, where the write side has been closed right before the read is started. The fput() of the file queues TWA_RESUME task_work, and we need that task_work to be run before ->release() is called for the pipe. If ->release() isn't called, then the read will sit forever waiting on data that will never arise. Fix this by io_run_task_work() so it checks if we have task_work pending rather than rely on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for that. The latter obviously doesn't work for task_work that is queued without TWA_SIGNAL. Reported-by: Christiano Haesbaert <haesbaert@haesbaert.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/665 Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'io_uring/io-wq.c')
-rw-r--r--io_uring/io-wq.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 87bc38b47103..81485c1a9879 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static struct io_wq_work *io_get_next_work(struct io_wqe_acct *acct,
static bool io_flush_signals(void)
{
- if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) || current->task_works) {
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
tracehook_notify_signal();
return true;