summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/memory.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMiaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>2021-02-24 23:04:33 +0300
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2021-03-04 13:38:19 +0300
commit6c074ae0a482d97828522ceae0618a63bc1ab3aa (patch)
tree253bf92034f2254b42a8b9a49f66c765beebf3b8 /mm/memory.c
parentcbb86d6a5db96b19c82078a62c54d128721d374f (diff)
downloadlinux-6c074ae0a482d97828522ceae0618a63bc1ab3aa.tar.xz
mm/memory.c: fix potential pte_unmap_unlock pte error
[ Upstream commit 90a3e375d324b2255b83e3dd29e99e2b05d82aaf ] Since commit 42e4089c7890 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings"), when the first pfn modify is not allowed, we would break the loop with pte unchanged. Then the wrong pte - 1 would be passed to pte_unmap_unlock. Andi said: "While the fix is correct, I'm not sure if it actually is a real bug. Is there any architecture that would do something else than unlocking the underlying page? If it's just the underlying page then it should be always the same page, so no bug" Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210109080118.20885-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 42e4089c789 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings") Signed-off-by: Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memory.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/memory.c6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index eb5722027160..f9522481f95c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2165,11 +2165,11 @@ static int remap_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
{
- pte_t *pte;
+ pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte;
spinlock_t *ptl;
int err = 0;
- pte = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ mapped_pte = pte = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
if (!pte)
return -ENOMEM;
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
@@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@ static int remap_pte_range(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
pfn++;
} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
+ pte_unmap_unlock(mapped_pte, ptl);
return err;
}