summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/mempolicy.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>2017-07-07 01:40:13 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-07-07 02:24:34 +0300
commite0dd7d53a6d2788f9616e6d7e3e725f8f84e4636 (patch)
treefb7a27bf39582c5c95141e3a78409bbe62101f45 /mm/mempolicy.c
parent5f155f27cb7f0670429e2b8bb954094fa4110df9 (diff)
downloadlinux-e0dd7d53a6d2788f9616e6d7e3e725f8f84e4636.tar.xz
mm, mempolicy: don't check cpuset seqlock where it doesn't matter
Two wrappers of __alloc_pages_nodemask() are checking task->mems_allowed_seq themselves to retry allocation that has raced with a cpuset update. This has been shown to be ineffective in preventing premature OOM's which can happen in __alloc_pages_slowpath() long before it returns back to the wrappers to detect the race at that level. Previous patches have made __alloc_pages_slowpath() more robust, so we can now simply remove the seqlock checking in the wrappers to prevent further wrong impression that it can actually help. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170517081140.30654-7-vbabka@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mempolicy.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/mempolicy.c16
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 047181452040..7d8e56214ac0 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1898,12 +1898,9 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct mempolicy *pol;
struct page *page;
int preferred_nid;
- unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
nodemask_t *nmask;
-retry_cpuset:
pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr);
- cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
if (pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
unsigned nid;
@@ -1945,8 +1942,6 @@ retry_cpuset:
page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order, preferred_nid, nmask);
mpol_cond_put(pol);
out:
- if (unlikely(!page && read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie)))
- goto retry_cpuset;
return page;
}
@@ -1964,23 +1959,15 @@ out:
* Allocate a page from the kernel page pool. When not in
* interrupt context and apply the current process NUMA policy.
* Returns NULL when no page can be allocated.
- *
- * Don't call cpuset_update_task_memory_state() unless
- * 1) it's ok to take cpuset_sem (can WAIT), and
- * 2) allocating for current task (not interrupt).
*/
struct page *alloc_pages_current(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = &default_policy;
struct page *page;
- unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
if (!in_interrupt() && !(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE))
pol = get_task_policy(current);
-retry_cpuset:
- cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
-
/*
* No reference counting needed for current->mempolicy
* nor system default_policy
@@ -1992,9 +1979,6 @@ retry_cpuset:
policy_node(gfp, pol, numa_node_id()),
policy_nodemask(gfp, pol));
- if (unlikely(!page && read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie)))
- goto retry_cpuset;
-
return page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_current);