summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/swap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>2017-02-25 01:56:23 +0300
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-02-25 04:46:54 +0300
commitc55e8d035b28b2867e68b0e2d0eee2c0f1016b43 (patch)
tree6ad9ccd15dbb27f5ec904ecb823bedccd06fc29e /mm/swap.c
parent4eda48235011d6965f5229f8955ddcd355311570 (diff)
downloadlinux-c55e8d035b28b2867e68b0e2d0eee2c0f1016b43.tar.xz
mm: vmscan: move dirty pages out of the way until they're flushed
We noticed a performance regression when moving hadoop workloads from 3.10 kernels to 4.0 and 4.6. This is accompanied by increased pageout activity initiated by kswapd as well as frequent bursts of allocation stalls and direct reclaim scans. Even lowering the dirty ratios to the equivalent of less than 1% of memory would not eliminate the issue, suggesting that dirty pages concentrate where the scanner is looking. This can be traced back to recent efforts of thrash avoidance. Where 3.10 would not detect refaulting pages and continuously supply clean cache to the inactive list, a thrashing workload on 4.0+ will detect and activate refaulting pages right away, distilling used-once pages on the inactive list much more effectively. This is by design, and it makes sense for clean cache. But for the most part our workload's cache faults are refaults and its use-once cache is from streaming writes. We end up with most of the inactive list dirty, and we don't go after the active cache as long as we have use-once pages around. But waiting for writes to avoid reclaiming clean cache that *might* refault is a bad trade-off. Even if the refaults happen, reads are faster than writes. Before getting bogged down on writeback, reclaim should first look at *all* cache in the system, even active cache. To accomplish this, activate pages that are dirty or under writeback when they reach the end of the inactive LRU. The pages are marked for immediate reclaim, meaning they'll get moved back to the inactive LRU tail as soon as they're written back and become reclaimable. But in the meantime, by reducing the inactive list to only immediately reclaimable pages, we allow the scanner to deactivate and refill the inactive list with clean cache from the active list tail to guarantee forward progress. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: update comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170202191957.22872-8-hannes@cmpxchg.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170123181641.23938-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/swap.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/swap.c9
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index aabf2e90fe32..c4910f14f957 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -209,9 +209,10 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
{
int *pgmoved = arg;
- if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
- enum lru_list lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
- list_move_tail(&page->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]);
+ if (PageLRU(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+ del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page));
+ ClearPageActive(page);
+ add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page, lruvec, page_lru(page));
(*pgmoved)++;
}
}
@@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ static void pagevec_move_tail(struct pagevec *pvec)
*/
void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
{
- if (!PageLocked(page) && !PageDirty(page) && !PageActive(page) &&
+ if (!PageLocked(page) && !PageDirty(page) &&
!PageUnevictable(page) && PageLRU(page)) {
struct pagevec *pvec;
unsigned long flags;