Merge branch 'Improve BPF syscall command documentation'

Joe Stringer says:

====================

The state of bpf(2) manual pages today is not exactly ideal. For the
most part, it was written several years ago and has not kept up with the
pace of development in the kernel tree. For instance, out of a total of
~35 commands to the BPF syscall available today, when I pull the
kernel-man-pages tree today I find just 6 documented commands: The very
basics of map interaction and program load.

In contrast, looking at bpf-helpers(7), I am able today to run one
command[0] to fetch API documentation of the very latest eBPF helpers
that have been added to the kernel. This documentation is up to date
because kernel maintainers enforce documenting the APIs as part of
the feature submission process. As far as I can tell, we rely on manual
synchronization from the kernel tree to the kernel-man-pages tree to
distribute these more widely, so all locations may not be completely up
to date. That said, the documentation does in fact exist in the first
place which is a major initial hurdle to overcome.

Given the relative success of the process around bpf-helpers(7) to
encourage developers to document their user-facing changes, in this
patch series I explore applying this technique to bpf(2) as well.
Unfortunately, even with bpf(2) being so out-of-date, there is still a
lot of content to convert over. In particular, the following aspects of
the bpf syscall could also be individually be generated from separate
documentation in the header:
* BPF syscall commands
* BPF map types
* BPF program types
* BPF program subtypes (aka expected_attach_type)
* BPF attachment points

Rather than tackle everything at once, I have focused in this series on
the syscall commands, "enum bpf_cmd". This series is structured to first
import what useful descriptions there are from the kernel-man-pages
tree, then piece-by-piece document a few of the syscalls in more detail
in cases where I could find useful documentation from the git tree or
from a casual read of the code. Not all documentation is comprehensive
at this point, but a basis is provided with examples that can be further
enhanced with subsequent follow-up patches. Note, the series in its
current state only includes documentation around the syscall commands
themselves, so in the short term it doesn't allow us to automate bpf(2)
generation; Only one section of the man page could be replaced. Though
if there is appetite for this approach, this should be trivial to
improve on, even if just by importing the remaining static text from the
kernel-man-pages tree.

Following that, the series enhances the python scripting around parsing
the descriptions from the header files and generating dedicated
ReStructured Text and troff output. Finally, to expose the new text and
reduce the likelihood of having it get out of date or break the docs
parser, it is added to the selftests and exposed through the kernel
documentation web pages.

The eventual goal of this effort would be to extend the kernel UAPI
headers such that each of the categories I had listed above (commands,
maps, progs, hooks) have dedicated documentation in the kernel tree, and
that developers must update the comments in the headers to document the
APIs prior to patch acceptance, and that we could auto-generate the
latest version of the bpf(2) manual pages based on a few static
description sections combined with the dynamically-generated output from
the header.

This patch series can also be found at the following location on GitHub:
https://github.com/joestringer/linux/tree/submit/bpf-command-docs_v2

Thanks also to Quentin Monnet for initial review.

[0]: make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf docs

v2:
* Remove build infrastructure in favor of kernel-doc directives
* Shift userspace-api docs under Documentation/userspace-api/ebpf
* Fix scripts/bpf_doc.py syscall --header (throw unsupported error)
* Improve .gitignore handling of newly autogenerated files

====================

Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions