summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/core/netpoll.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAntonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com>2013-10-24 01:36:30 +0400
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2013-10-26 03:26:58 +0400
commit8fb479a47c869820966e7298f38038aa334d889c (patch)
tree8bed2e3774b7334973aea14ed06f7156cde2fb87 /net/core/netpoll.c
parentc7c6effdeffcafd792b9f880ad52e48689eea4ad (diff)
downloadlinux-8fb479a47c869820966e7298f38038aa334d889c.tar.xz
netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb
Right now skb->data is passed to rx_hook() even if the skb has not been linearised and without giving rx_hook() a way to linearise it. Change the rx_hook() interface and make it accept the skb and the offset to the UDP payload as arguments. rx_hook() is also renamed to rx_skb_hook() to ensure that out of the tree users notice the API change. In this way any rx_skb_hook() implementation can perform all the needed operations to properly (and safely) access the skb data. Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/netpoll.c')
-rw-r--r--net/core/netpoll.c31
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index fc75c9e461b8..8f971990677c 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -636,8 +636,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
- /* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
- we're fine by sending a single reply */
+ /* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+ * address we're fine by sending a single reply
+ */
break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -719,8 +720,9 @@ static void netpoll_neigh_reply(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo
netpoll_send_skb(np, send_skb);
- /* If there are several rx_hooks for the same address,
- we're fine by sending a single reply */
+ /* If there are several rx_skb_hooks for the same
+ * address, we're fine by sending a single reply
+ */
break;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
@@ -756,11 +758,12 @@ static bool pkt_is_ns(struct sk_buff *skb)
int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
{
- int proto, len, ulen;
- int hits = 0;
+ int proto, len, ulen, data_len;
+ int hits = 0, offset;
const struct iphdr *iph;
struct udphdr *uh;
struct netpoll *np, *tmp;
+ uint16_t source;
if (list_empty(&npinfo->rx_np))
goto out;
@@ -820,7 +823,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
len -= iph->ihl*4;
uh = (struct udphdr *)(((char *)iph) + iph->ihl*4);
+ offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+ data_len = skb->len - offset;
+ source = ntohs(uh->source);
if (ulen != len)
goto out;
@@ -834,9 +840,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
continue;
- np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
- (char *)(uh+1),
- ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+ np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
hits++;
}
} else {
@@ -859,7 +863,10 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct udphdr)))
goto out;
uh = udp_hdr(skb);
+ offset = (unsigned char *)(uh + 1) - skb->data;
ulen = ntohs(uh->len);
+ data_len = skb->len - offset;
+ source = ntohs(uh->source);
if (ulen != skb->len)
goto out;
if (udp6_csum_init(skb, uh, IPPROTO_UDP))
@@ -872,9 +879,7 @@ int __netpoll_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netpoll_info *npinfo)
if (np->local_port && np->local_port != ntohs(uh->dest))
continue;
- np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
- (char *)(uh+1),
- ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
+ np->rx_skb_hook(np, source, skb, offset, data_len);
hits++;
}
#endif
@@ -1062,7 +1067,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev, gfp_t gfp)
npinfo->netpoll = np;
- if (np->rx_hook) {
+ if (np->rx_skb_hook) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&npinfo->rx_lock, flags);
npinfo->rx_flags |= NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
list_add_tail(&np->rx, &npinfo->rx_np);