summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/netlabel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>2021-03-05 00:29:51 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-03-05 02:26:57 +0300
commitad5d07f4a9cd671233ae20983848874731102c08 (patch)
tree3f3646f6f025a9f2f2701773053ad4fe378e207e /net/netlabel
parent67eb211487f0c993d9f402d1c196ef159fd6a3b5 (diff)
downloadlinux-ad5d07f4a9cd671233ae20983848874731102c08.tar.xz
cipso,calipso: resolve a number of problems with the DOI refcounts
The current CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting scheme for the DOI definitions is a bit flawed in that we: 1. Don't correctly match gets/puts in netlbl_cipsov4_list(). 2. Decrement the refcount on each attempt to remove the DOI from the DOI list, only removing it from the list once the refcount drops to zero. This patch fixes these problems by adding the missing "puts" to netlbl_cipsov4_list() and introduces a more conventional, i.e. not-buggy, refcounting mechanism to the DOI definitions. Upon the addition of a DOI to the DOI list, it is initialized with a refcount of one, removing a DOI from the list removes it from the list and drops the refcount by one; "gets" and "puts" behave as expected with respect to refcounts, increasing and decreasing the DOI's refcount by one. Fixes: b1edeb102397 ("netlabel: Replace protocol/NetLabel linking with refrerence counts") Fixes: d7cce01504a0 ("netlabel: Add support for removing a CALIPSO DOI.") Reported-by: syzbot+9ec037722d2603a9f52e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/netlabel')
-rw-r--r--net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
index 726dda95934c..4f50a64315cf 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ list_start:
break;
}
+ cipso_v4_doi_putdef(doi_def);
rcu_read_unlock();
genlmsg_end(ans_skb, data);
@@ -583,12 +584,14 @@ list_start:
list_retry:
/* XXX - this limit is a guesstimate */
if (nlsze_mult < 4) {
+ cipso_v4_doi_putdef(doi_def);
rcu_read_unlock();
kfree_skb(ans_skb);
nlsze_mult *= 2;
goto list_start;
}
list_failure_lock:
+ cipso_v4_doi_putdef(doi_def);
rcu_read_unlock();
list_failure:
kfree_skb(ans_skb);