summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>2021-07-29 00:54:28 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-07-29 17:35:01 +0300
commitbef0746cf4cce238b1943df5d5b8f3103da92ead (patch)
treebbae2d243baeaf310bc9335645cc04ae55560041 /net
parentcde8078e83e32022e30a4f670c2c8179f2f08991 (diff)
downloadlinux-bef0746cf4cce238b1943df5d5b8f3103da92ead.tar.xz
net: dsa: sja1105: make sure untagged packets are dropped on ingress ports with no pvid
Surprisingly, this configuration: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp2 vid 1 still has the sja1105 switch sending untagged packets to the CPU (and failing to decode them, since dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid searches by VID 1 and rightfully finds no bridge VLAN 1 on a port). Dumping the switch configuration, the VLANs are managed properly: - the pvid of swp2 is 1 in the MAC Configuration Table, but - only the CPU port is in the port membership of VLANID 1 in the VLAN Lookup Table When the ingress packets are tagged with VID 1, they are properly dropped. But when they are untagged, they are able to reach the CPU port. Also, when the pvid in the MAC Configuration Table is changed to e.g. 55 (an unused VLAN), the untagged packets are also dropped. So it looks like: - the switch bypasses ingress VLAN membership checks for untagged traffic - the reason why the untagged traffic is dropped when I make the pvid 55 is due to the lack of valid destination ports in VLAN 55, rather than an ingress membership violation - the ingress VLAN membership cheks are only done for VLAN-tagged traffic Interesting. It looks like there is an explicit bit to drop untagged traffic, so we should probably be using that to preserve user expectations. Note that only VLAN-aware ports should drop untagged packets due to no pvid - when VLAN-unaware, the software bridge doesn't do this even if there is no pvid on any bridge port and on the bridge itself. So the new sja1105_drop_untagged() function cannot simply be called with "false" from sja1105_bridge_vlan_add() and with "true" from sja1105_bridge_vlan_del. Instead, we need to also consider the VLAN awareness state. That means we need to hook the "drop untagged" setting in all the same places where the "commit pvid" logic is, and it needs to factor in all the state when flipping the "drop untagged" bit: is our current pvid in the VLAN Lookup Table, and is the current port in that VLAN's port membership list? VLAN-unaware ports will never drop untagged frames because these checks always succeed by construction, and the tag_8021q VLANs cannot be changed by the user. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions