libbpf: Split bpf_core_apply_relo()

BTFGen needs to run the core relocation logic in order to understand
what are the types involved in a given relocation.

Currently bpf_core_apply_relo() calculates and **applies** a relocation
to an instruction. Having both operations in the same function makes it
difficult to only calculate the relocation without patching the
instruction. This commit splits that logic in two different phases: (1)
calculate the relocation and (2) patch the instruction.

For the first phase bpf_core_apply_relo() is renamed to
bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() who is now only on charge of calculating the
relocation, the second phase uses the already existing
bpf_core_patch_insn(). bpf_object__relocate_core() uses both of them and
the BTFGen will use only bpf_core_calc_relo_insn().

Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@kinvolk.io>
Signed-off-by: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@aquasec.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lorenzo.fontana@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leonardo.didonato@elastic.co>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215225856.671072-2-mauricio@kinvolk.io

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 56 deletions

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
index 910865e29edc..f946f23eab20 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
@@ -775,31 +775,6 @@ static int bpf_core_calc_enumval_relo(const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct bpf_core_relo_res
-{
-	/* expected value in the instruction, unless validate == false */
-	__u32 orig_val;
-	/* new value that needs to be patched up to */
-	__u32 new_val;
-	/* relocation unsuccessful, poison instruction, but don't fail load */
-	bool poison;
-	/* some relocations can't be validated against orig_val */
-	bool validate;
-	/* for field byte offset relocations or the forms:
-	 *     *(T *)(rX + <off>) = rY
-	 *     rX = *(T *)(rY + <off>),
-	 * we remember original and resolved field size to adjust direct
-	 * memory loads of pointers and integers; this is necessary for 32-bit
-	 * host kernel architectures, but also allows to automatically
-	 * relocate fields that were resized from, e.g., u32 to u64, etc.
-	 */
-	bool fail_memsz_adjust;
-	__u32 orig_sz;
-	__u32 orig_type_id;
-	__u32 new_sz;
-	__u32 new_type_id;
-};
-
 /* Calculate original and target relocation values, given local and target
  * specs and relocation kind. These values are calculated for each candidate.
  * If there are multiple candidates, resulting values should all be consistent
@@ -951,9 +926,9 @@ static int insn_bytes_to_bpf_size(__u32 sz)
  * 5. *(T *)(rX + <off>) = rY, where T is one of {u8, u16, u32, u64};
  * 6. *(T *)(rX + <off>) = <imm>, where T is one of {u8, u16, u32, u64}.
  */
-static int bpf_core_patch_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
-			       int insn_idx, const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
-			       int relo_idx, const struct bpf_core_relo_res *res)
+int bpf_core_patch_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			int insn_idx, const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
+			int relo_idx, const struct bpf_core_relo_res *res)
 {
 	__u32 orig_val, new_val;
 	__u8 class;
@@ -1128,7 +1103,7 @@ static void bpf_core_dump_spec(const char *prog_name, int level, const struct bp
 }
 
 /*
- * CO-RE relocate single instruction.
+ * Calculate CO-RE relocation target result.
  *
  * The outline and important points of the algorithm:
  * 1. For given local type, find corresponding candidate target types.
@@ -1177,18 +1152,18 @@ static void bpf_core_dump_spec(const char *prog_name, int level, const struct bp
  *    between multiple relocations for the same type ID and is updated as some
  *    of the candidates are pruned due to structural incompatibility.
  */
-int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
-			     int insn_idx,
-			     const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
-			     int relo_idx,
-			     const struct btf *local_btf,
-			     struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands,
-			     struct bpf_core_spec *specs_scratch)
+int bpf_core_calc_relo_insn(const char *prog_name,
+			    const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
+			    int relo_idx,
+			    const struct btf *local_btf,
+			    struct bpf_core_cand_list *cands,
+			    struct bpf_core_spec *specs_scratch,
+			    struct bpf_core_relo_res *targ_res)
 {
 	struct bpf_core_spec *local_spec = &specs_scratch[0];
 	struct bpf_core_spec *cand_spec = &specs_scratch[1];
 	struct bpf_core_spec *targ_spec = &specs_scratch[2];
-	struct bpf_core_relo_res cand_res, targ_res;
+	struct bpf_core_relo_res cand_res;
 	const struct btf_type *local_type;
 	const char *local_name;
 	__u32 local_id;
@@ -1223,12 +1198,12 @@ int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	/* TYPE_ID_LOCAL relo is special and doesn't need candidate search */
 	if (relo->kind == BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL) {
 		/* bpf_insn's imm value could get out of sync during linking */
-		memset(&targ_res, 0, sizeof(targ_res));
-		targ_res.validate = false;
-		targ_res.poison = false;
-		targ_res.orig_val = local_spec->root_type_id;
-		targ_res.new_val = local_spec->root_type_id;
-		goto patch_insn;
+		memset(targ_res, 0, sizeof(*targ_res));
+		targ_res->validate = false;
+		targ_res->poison = false;
+		targ_res->orig_val = local_spec->root_type_id;
+		targ_res->new_val = local_spec->root_type_id;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	/* libbpf doesn't support candidate search for anonymous types */
@@ -1262,7 +1237,7 @@ int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			return err;
 
 		if (j == 0) {
-			targ_res = cand_res;
+			*targ_res = cand_res;
 			*targ_spec = *cand_spec;
 		} else if (cand_spec->bit_offset != targ_spec->bit_offset) {
 			/* if there are many field relo candidates, they
@@ -1272,7 +1247,8 @@ int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 				prog_name, relo_idx, cand_spec->bit_offset,
 				targ_spec->bit_offset);
 			return -EINVAL;
-		} else if (cand_res.poison != targ_res.poison || cand_res.new_val != targ_res.new_val) {
+		} else if (cand_res.poison != targ_res->poison ||
+			   cand_res.new_val != targ_res->new_val) {
 			/* all candidates should result in the same relocation
 			 * decision and value, otherwise it's dangerous to
 			 * proceed due to ambiguity
@@ -1280,7 +1256,7 @@ int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: relocation decision ambiguity: %s %u != %s %u\n",
 				prog_name, relo_idx,
 				cand_res.poison ? "failure" : "success", cand_res.new_val,
-				targ_res.poison ? "failure" : "success", targ_res.new_val);
+				targ_res->poison ? "failure" : "success", targ_res->new_val);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
@@ -1314,19 +1290,10 @@ int bpf_core_apply_relo_insn(const char *prog_name, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			 prog_name, relo_idx);
 
 		/* calculate single target relo result explicitly */
-		err = bpf_core_calc_relo(prog_name, relo, relo_idx, local_spec, NULL, &targ_res);
+		err = bpf_core_calc_relo(prog_name, relo, relo_idx, local_spec, NULL, targ_res);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	}
 
-patch_insn:
-	/* bpf_core_patch_insn() should know how to handle missing targ_spec */
-	err = bpf_core_patch_insn(prog_name, insn, insn_idx, relo, relo_idx, &targ_res);
-	if (err) {
-		pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: failed to patch insn #%u: %d\n",
-			prog_name, relo_idx, relo->insn_off / 8, err);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	return 0;
 }