diff options
| author | Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> | 2023-11-22 19:47:02 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2024-01-03 14:36:47 +0300 |
| commit | 36d842d654beba970e74ff0f6016c93623b82d37 (patch) | |
| tree | b3e0f1a94f0ca29f7e83049b9e7bc3e14430824d /tools/testing/selftests/riscv | |
| parent | b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86 (diff) | |
| download | linux-36d842d654beba970e74ff0f6016c93623b82d37.tar.xz | |
RISC-V: hwprobe: Clarify cpus size parameter
The "count" parameter associated with the 'cpus' parameter of the
hwprobe syscall is the size in bytes of 'cpus'. Naming it 'cpu_count'
may mislead users (it did me) to think it's the number of CPUs that
are or can be represented by 'cpus' instead. This is particularly
easy (IMO) to get wrong since 'cpus' is documented to be defined by
CPU_SET(3) and CPU_SET(3) also documents a CPU_COUNT() (the number
of CPUs in set) macro. CPU_SET(3) refers to the size of cpu sets
with 'setsize'. Adopt 'cpusetsize' for the hwprobe parameter and
specifically state it is in bytes in Documentation/riscv/hwprobe.rst
to clarify.
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122164700.127954-7-ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/riscv')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c | 10 |
3 files changed, 3 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c index c474891df307..d53e0889b59e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) ksft_test_result(out != 0, "Bad CPU set\n"); out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0); - ksft_test_result(out != 0, "NULL CPU set with non-zero count\n"); + ksft_test_result(out != 0, "NULL CPU set with non-zero size\n"); pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR; out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h index 721b0ce73a56..e3fccb390c4d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h @@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ * contain the call. */ long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count, - size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags); + size_t cpusetsize, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags); #endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c index b348b475be57..8dcd399ef7fc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c @@ -1,20 +1,12 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <unistd.h> -#include <asm/hwprobe.h> #include <errno.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +#include "../hwprobe/hwprobe.h" #include "../../kselftest.h" -/* - * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it - * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to - * contain the call. - */ -long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count, - size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags); - #define NEXT_PROGRAM "./vstate_exec_nolibc" static int launch_test(int test_inherit) { |