summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/process
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/2.Process.rst15
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/howto.rst2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst10
4 files changed, 16 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
index e05fb1b8f8b6..6a919cffcbfd 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/2.Process.rst
@@ -126,17 +126,10 @@ than one development cycle past their initial release. So, for example, the
5.2.21 was the final stable update of the 5.2 release.
Some kernels are designated "long term" kernels; they will receive support
-for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels
-and their maintainers are:
-
- ====== ================================ =======================
- 3.16 Ben Hutchings (very long-term kernel)
- 4.4 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin (very long-term kernel)
- 4.9 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin
- 4.14 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin
- 4.19 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin
- 5.4 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin
- ====== ================================ =======================
+for a longer period. Please refer to the following link for the list of active
+long term kernel versions and their maintainers:
+
+ https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html
The selection of a kernel for long-term support is purely a matter of a
maintainer having the need and the time to maintain that release. There
diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
index 922e0b547bc3..66b07f14714c 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) or other maintainers if you're
uncertain how to handle situations that come up. It will not be
considered a violation report unless you want it to be. If you are
uncertain about approaching the TAB or any other maintainers, please
-reach out to our conflict mediator, Joanna Lee <joanna.lee@gesmer.com>.
+reach out to our conflict mediator, Joanna Lee <jlee@linuxfoundation.org>.
In the end, "be kind to each other" is really what the end goal is for
everybody. We know everyone is human and we all fail at times, but the
diff --git a/Documentation/process/howto.rst b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
index bd15c393ba3c..cb6abcb2b6d0 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/howto.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/howto.rst
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ experience, the following books are good for, if anything, reference:
- "C: A Reference Manual" by Harbison and Steele [Prentice Hall]
The kernel is written using GNU C and the GNU toolchain. While it
-adheres to the ISO C89 standard, it uses a number of extensions that are
+adheres to the ISO C11 standard, it uses a number of extensions that are
not featured in the standard. The kernel is a freestanding C
environment, with no reliance on the standard C library, so some
portions of the C standard are not supported. Arbitrary long long
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
index d14007081595..1fa5ab8754d3 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
@@ -319,3 +319,13 @@ unpatched tree to confirm infrastructure didn't mangle it.
Finally, go back and read
:ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst <submittingpatches>`
to be sure you are not repeating some common mistake documented there.
+
+My company uses peer feedback in employee performance reviews. Can I ask netdev maintainers for feedback?
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Yes, especially if you spend significant amount of time reviewing code
+and go out of your way to improve shared infrastructure.
+
+The feedback must be requested by you, the contributor, and will always
+be shared with you (even if you request for it to be submitted to your
+manager).