| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Use the correct function name in a comment.
Use the correct function parameter name in a comment.
These changes prevent the following kernel-doc warnings:
omap-secure.c:61: warning: expecting prototype for omap_sec_dispatcher(). Prototype was for omap_secure_dispatcher() instead
omap-secure.c:191: warning: Excess function parameter 'clr_bits' description in 'rx51_secure_update_aux_cr'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: patches@armlinux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20240117011004.22669-13-rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
A number of functions are only called from the file they
are defined in, so remove the extern declarations and
make them local to those files.
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
These are a number of individual functions that were either never
used, or that had their last user removed in a prior cleanup.
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Moving sram code from plat-omap got the attention of the kernel test robot.
I found a few more places with related warnings because the sram
references are a mix of kernel pointers and __iomem pointers:
mach-omap1/sram-init.c:56:17: warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c:667:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
mach-omap2/sram.c:78:17: warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
mach-omap2/omap4-common.c:142:27: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
mach-omap2/omap4-common.c:142:27: expected void [noderef] __iomem *static [toplevel] sram_sync
mach-omap2/omap4-common.c:142:27: got void *
mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:113:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:113:45: expected void [noderef] __iomem *save_regs
mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:113:45: got void *extern [addressable] [toplevel] omap3_secure_ram_storage
There is no good solution here, as sram is a bit special in this
regard. Change the annotations to at least shut up the warnings.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Commit 9c46929e7989 ("ARM: implement THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK for uniprocessor
systems") started triggering an issue with smc calls hanging on boot as
VMAP_STACK is now enabled by default.
Based on discussions on the #armlinux irc channel, Arnd noticed that omaps
are using __pa() for stack for smc calls. This does not work with vmap
stack.
Let's fix the issue by changing the param arrays to use static param[5] for
each function for __pa() to work. This consumes a bit more memory compared
to adding a single static buffer, but avoids potential races with the smc
calls initializing the shared buffer. For omap_secure_dispatcher(), we need
to use a cpu specific buffer as there's nothing currently ensuring it only
gets called from cpu0.
Fixes: 9c46929e7989 ("ARM: implement THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK for uniprocessor systems")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220331171737.48211-1-tony@atomide.com
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
We need to add a dummy smc call to the cpuidle wakeup path to force the
ROM code to save the return address after MMU is enabled again. This is
needed to prevent random hangs on secure devices like droid4.
Otherwise the system will eventually hang when entering deeper SoC idle
states with the core and mpu domains in open-switch retention (OSWR).
The hang happens as the ROM code tries to use the earlier physical return
address set by omap-headsmp.S with MMU off while waking up CPU1 again.
The hangs started happening in theory already with commit caf8c87d7ff2
("ARM: OMAP2+: Allow core oswr for omap4"), but in practise the issue went
unnoticed as various drivers were often blocking any deeper idle states
with hardware autoidle features.
This patch is based on an earlier TI Linux kernel tree commit 92f0b3028d9e
("OMAP4: PM: update ROM return address for OSWR and OFF") written by
Carlos Leija <cileija@ti.com>, Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>, and
Bryan Buckley <bryan.buckley@ti.com>. A later version of the patch was
updated to use CPU_PM notifiers by Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Leija <cileija@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Buckley <bryan.buckley@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Fixes: caf8c87d7ff2 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Allow core oswr for omap4")
Reported-by: Carl Philipp Klemm <philipp@uvos.xyz>
Reported-by: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
Cc: Ivan Jelincic <parazyd@dyne.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>
[tony@atomide.com: updated to apply, updated description]
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
For security reasons I stopped using gmail account and kernel address is
now up-to-date alias to my personal address.
People periodically send me emails to address which they found in source
code of drivers, so this change reflects state where people can contact
me.
[ Added .mailmap entry as per Joe Perches - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200307104237.8199-1-pali@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
On High-Security(HS) OMAP2+ class devices a couple actions must be
performed from the ARM TrustZone during boot. These traditionally can be
performed by calling into the secure ROM code resident in this secure
world using legacy SMC calls. Optionally OP-TEE can replace this secure
world functionality by replacing the ROM after boot. ARM recommends a
standard calling convention is used for this interaction (SMC Calling
Convention). We check for the presence of OP-TEE and use this type of
call to perform the needed actions, falling back to the legacy OMAP ROM
call if OP-TEE is not available.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
This check and associated flag can be used to signal the presence
of OP-TEE on the platform. This can be used to determine which
SMC calls to make to perform secure operations.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
This can be used for detecting secure features or making early device
init sequence changes based on device security type.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Based on 2 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation #
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 4122 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604081206.933168790@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
In configurations without CONFIG_OMAP3 but with secure RAM support,
we now run into a link failure:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.o: In function `omap3_save_secure_ram':
omap-secure.c:(.text+0x130): undefined reference to `save_secure_ram_context'
The omap3_save_secure_ram() function is only called from the OMAP34xx
power management code, so we can simply hide that function in the
appropriate #ifdef.
Fixes: d09220a887f7 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix SRAM virt to phys translation for save_secure_ram_context")
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
With the CMA changes from Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, it
was noticed that n900 stopped booting. After investigating it turned
out that n900 save_secure_ram_context does some whacky virtual to
physical address translation for the SRAM data address.
As we now only have minimal parts of omap3 idle code copied to SRAM,
running save_secure_ram_context() in SRAM is not needed. It only gets
called on PM init. And it seems there's no need to ever call this from
SRAM idle code.
So let's just keep save_secure_ram_context() in DDR, and pass it the
physical address of the parameters. We can do everything else in
omap-secure.c like we already do for other secure code.
And since we don't have any documentation, I still have no clue what
the values for 0, 1 and 1 for the parameters might be. If somebody has
figured it out, please do send a patch to add some comments.
Debugged-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Adding this driver as platform device and only for RX-51 until somebody test if
it working also on other OMAP3 HS devices and until there will be generic ARM
way to deal with SMC calls.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
[tony@atomide.com: folded in the clock alias change]
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Closed and signed Nokia X-Loader bootloader stored in RX-51 nand does not set
IBE bit in ACTLR and starting kernel in non-secure mode. So direct write to
ACTLR by our kernel does not working and the code for ARM errata 430973 in
commit 7ce236fcd6fd45b0441a2d49acb2ceb2de2e8a47 that sets IBE bit is a noop.
In order to have workaround for ARM errata 430973 from non-secure world on
RX-51 we needs Secure Monitor Call to set IBE BIT in ACTLR.
This patch adds RX-51 specific secure support code and sets IBE bit in ACTLR
during board init code for ARM errata 430973 workaround.
Note that new function rx51_secure_dispatcher() differs from existing
omap_secure_dispatcher(). It calling omap_smc3() and param[0] is nargs+1.
ARM errata 430973 workaround is needed for thumb-2 ISA compiled userspace
binaries. Without this workaround thumb-2 binaries crashing. So with this
patch it is possible to recompile and run applications/binaries with thumb-2
ISA on RX-51.
Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Moving plat/omap-secure.h locally to mach-omap2/
as part of single zImage work
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
memblock_steal tries to reserve physical memory during boot.
When the requested size is not aligned on the section size
then, the remaining memory available for lowmem becomes
unaligned on the section boundary. There is a issue with this,
which is discussed in the thread below.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/28/112
The final conclusion from the thread seems to
be align the memblock_steal calls on the SECTION boundary.
The issue comes out when LPAE is enabled, where the
section size is 2MB.
Boot tested this on OMAP5 evm with and without LPAE.
Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
This can be local to mach-omap2.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
|
Several C files in arch/arm/mach-omap* and arch/arm/plat-omap declare
functions that are used by other files, but don't include the header
file where the prototype is declared. This results in the following
warnings from sparse:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:114:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_pending' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:186:13: warning: symbol 'omap2_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:191:13: warning: symbol 'omap3_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:196:13: warning: symbol 'ti81xx_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:233:39: warning: symbol 'omap2_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:242:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:265:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:291:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_prepare_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:306:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_resume_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:312:39: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:59:12: warning: symbol 'omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-display.c:133:13: warning: symbol 'zoom_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:73:13: warning: symbol 'omap_init_consistent_dma_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_flags' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:179:13: warning: symbol 'omap1_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/mach-omap1/reset.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'omap1_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fix by including the appropriate header files.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy <svadivu@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
|
|
Several platforms are now using the memblock_alloc+memblock_free+
memblock_remove trick to obtain memory which won't be mapped in the
kernel's page tables. Most platforms do this (correctly) in the
->reserve callback. However, OMAP has started to call these functions
outside of this callback, and this is extremely unsafe - memory will
not be unmapped, and could well be given out after memblock is no
longer responsible for its management.
So, provide arm_memblock_steal() to perform this function, and ensure
that it panic()s if it is used inappropriately. Convert everyone
over, including OMAP.
As a result, OMAP with OMAP4_ERRATA_I688 enabled will panic on boot
with this change. Mark this option as BROKEN and make it depend on
BROKEN. OMAP needs to be fixed, or 137d105d50 (ARM: OMAP4: Fix
errata i688 with MPU interconnect barriers.) reverted until such
time it can be fixed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Allocate the memory to save secure ram context which needs
to be done when MPU is hitting OFF mode.
The ROM code expects a physical address to this memory
and hence use memblock APIs to reserve this memory as part
of .reserve() callback. Maximum size as per secure RAM requirements
is allocated.
To keep omap1 build working, omap-secure.h file is created
under plat-omap directory.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
|
On OMAP secure/emulation devices, certain APIs are exported by secure
code. Add an infrastructure so that relevant operations on secure
devices can be implemented using it.
While at this, rename omap44xx-smc.S to omap-smc.S since the common APIs
can be used on other OMAP's too.
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Tested-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
|
